Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The science of climate change is anything but settled
the Washington Examiner ^ | March15,2019 | Roy W. Spencer

Posted on 03/16/2019 5:32:15 PM PDT by Hojczyk

In their letter, the Gang of 58 then used Hurricane Florence from last Major tornadoes in the U.S. have been on a downward trend since monitoring began in the 1950s, with record-low activity in 2018. Agricultural productivity and yields per acre have been rising around the world, despite modestly rising temperatures. Yes, there are indisputable facts that don’t agree with what the public is being told about climate change.

The letter implies Mr. Trump has political rather than scientific motives. But science does not determine policy, it merely informs the policymakers. The policymakers need an unbiased review of the science. It doesn’t matter if the vast majority of scientists support global warming alarmism. Their careers now depend upon it, and they try their hardest to prevent minority views from appearing in peer-reviewed journals.

Even the organization from which the letter to the president originated is not unbiased — its name is “The Center for Climate and Security.” Does anyone think the Center will continue to exist if there is no significant connection between climate and national security?year as a supposed example of human-caused climate change. Seriously? Until 2017, The U.S. went a record-setting 11-plus years without a major hurricane strike (Cat 3 or greater), and Hurricane Florence was normal and expected from a climatological point of view, making landfall as a Category 1 storm.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: climatechange; climatedeniers; globalwarminghoax; royspencer; sciencetrust; settledscience

1 posted on 03/16/2019 5:32:15 PM PDT by Hojczyk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Tech Tyranny’: Google promptly vanishes Greenpeace co-founder Dr. Moore from enviro group’s history after Trump tweets his skeptical climate views

‘Welcome to Neo-Stalinism’

Google, with the help of Greenpeace, is revising Greenpeace’s history to erase Dr. Moore from his role in co-founding the environmental group. But Greenpeace’s own website has previously featured Moore as one of its “founders.”

Moore: “Google has removed my photo and name from the ‘Founders of Greenpeace’. It was still there 2 days ago but now I am erased. Tech Tyranny!!”

Google & Greenpeace disappear a founder, much like ‘The Commissar Vanishes’ in Soviet Russia.

Link: https://www.climatedepot.com/2019/03/16/tech-tyranny-google-promptly-vanishes-greenpeace-co-founder-dr-moore-from-enviro-groups-history-after-he-calls-climate-scare-fake-science/


2 posted on 03/16/2019 5:36:36 PM PDT by CharlesMartelsGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

https://www.weatherbell.com/video/the-saturday-summary-165?full

This is pretty good today...Saturday summary


3 posted on 03/16/2019 5:38:53 PM PDT by Hojczyk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
"“The Center for Climate and Security.” Does anyone think the Center will continue to exist if there is no significant connection between climate and national security?"

It might be needed to help with the coming ice age.


4 posted on 03/16/2019 5:47:00 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3735096/posts


5 posted on 03/16/2019 5:55:33 PM PDT by Jayster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
'97% Of Climate Scientists Agree' Is 100% Wrong Jan 6, 2015
The 97 percent claim is a deliberate misrepresentation designed to intimidate the public—and numerous scientists whose papers were classified by Cook protested:
“Cook survey included 10 of my 122 eligible papers. 5/10 were rated incorrectly. 4/5 were rated as endorse rather than neutral.”

Understanding the Global Warming Debate February 9, 2012
Let's look at the actual propositions the 97% agreed to in one such study conducted at the University of Illinois.  Here they are:

1. When compared with pre-1800s levels, do you think that mean global temperatures have generally risen, fallen, or remained relatively constant?

2. Do you think human activity is a significant contributing factor in changing mean global temperatures?

The 97% answered "risen" and "yes" to these two questions.  But depending on how one defines "significant" (is 20% a significant factor?) I could get 97% of a group of science-based skeptics to agree to the same answers.

Did I mention the emperor's new suit?

6 posted on 03/16/2019 6:23:04 PM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

The “97 percent consensus” is total fraud. The claim is based on the fact that of the 300 “scientists” WHO RESPONDED to the questionnaire, 97 percent agreed with the assertion of Anthropogenic Climate Change ...

HOWEVER - and what is never revealed by the ACC proponents - more than 5000 scientists, who were petitioned, DID NOT RESPOND TO THE QUESTIONNAIRE.

Also, context matters - of those “scientists” who did respond, the majority were NOT climatologists.

Related material:
https://www.nationalreview.com/2015/10/climate-change-no-its-not-97-percent-consensus-ian-tuttle/

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/2013/05/30/global-warming-alarmists-caught-doctoring-97-percent-consensus-claims/#3200d081485d

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/05/17/to-john-cook-it-isnt-hate-its-pity-pity-for-having-such-a-weak-argument-you-are-forced-to-fabricate-in-epic-proportions/


7 posted on 03/16/2019 6:29:45 PM PDT by JME_FAN (If you lived here, you'd be home by now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

The climate is changing. It has been changing from the moment Earth formed, and it will continue to change until the moment the Earth ceases to exist.


8 posted on 03/16/2019 8:11:38 PM PDT by TBP (Progressives lack compassion and tolerance. Their self-aggrandizement is all that matters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

WEATHER!
constantly changing!


9 posted on 03/16/2019 8:27:54 PM PDT by onyx (Join 300 CLUB BY DONATING $34 MONTHLY! TRUMP'SCENTER>AY IS THE WINNING WAY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

You mean the “ federal funding for your research will end if you don’t follow our agenda” science?


10 posted on 03/17/2019 3:32:12 AM PDT by ronnie raygun (nic dip.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

btt


11 posted on 03/17/2019 3:41:27 AM PDT by KSCITYBOY (The media is corrupt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson