That goes without saying. Try to stay on track.
We are talking about Leo's suggestion that the President declare martial law. It's not about whether he would, but if he should.
In a word, you said that he should not. Leo, myself, and many others believe that we're fast approaching an historic inflection point. The presidency is being neutered and nullified by a majority of elected and appointed officers of our government, and no one but Trump is fighting back.
The question is; should we continue working within the rules while our enemies live by the law of the jungle? We're getting our asses kicked, and will soon be in a last ditch effort to save our nation, if something drastic isn't done soon.
I'm not even recommending martial law, but somehow, greater force must be exerted against the left and the RINOs than what's being brought to bear at present.
“I’m not even recommending martial law, but somehow, greater force must be exerted against the left and the RINOs than what’s being brought to bear at present. “
Good post. The rule of law is evaporating at a rapid pace. It was apparent we were going there(martial law) one way or another. If PDJT can’t make a quick ‘course’ correction in America, the rats are going to take control permanently(they’re on the march). Then all the protestations of, ‘but we’re a constitutional republic’ will fall on deaf ears or be deemed hate speech.
True patriotism sometimes requires of men to act exactly contrary , at one period , to that which it does at another , and the motive which impels them the desire to do right is precisely the same . The circumstances which govern their actions change ; and their conduct must conform to the new order of things
* Robert E. Lee *