To: BlackFemaleArmyColonel
Unenforceable but sends a clear message. I’ll support it for that reason.
4 posted on
03/20/2019 3:02:30 PM PDT by
JamesP81
(The Democrat Party is a criminal organization.)
To: JamesP81
If it passes, it’s no different than sanctuary laws in other states. The feds won’t stop those how can they stop this? This has the potential to get interesting.
7 posted on
03/20/2019 3:06:47 PM PDT by
Equine1952
(Get yourself a ticket on a common mans train of thought))
To: JamesP81
"Unenforceable but sends a clear message. I’ll support it for that reason." Sure it's unenforceable but tell that to the cities that are sanctuary cities for illegal aliens. At least the gun sanctuaries have the backing of the US Constitution. Unlike cities that give cover for an invasion of foreign nationals subverting the sovereignty of the United States.
22 posted on
03/20/2019 3:38:15 PM PDT by
Desron13
(You may choose to ignore reality but you can't force reality to ignore you.)
To: JamesP81
Why? Sanctuary cities and states are openly violating federal law. Precedent has been clearly set by the left.
45 posted on
03/20/2019 4:28:07 PM PDT by
sarge83
To: JamesP81
Looks pretty enforceable to me.
To: JamesP81
Gun laws Oregon is proposing are unconstitutional but will be enforced
54 posted on
03/20/2019 4:40:08 PM PDT by
Cold Heart
(Oregon, tyranny, taxes and tolls)
To: JamesP81
If California can enforce their anti-government crap, why can’t Missouri?
75 posted on
03/20/2019 6:08:28 PM PDT by
Luke21
(Vote, vote, vote doesn't work, work work.)
To: JamesP81
The Feds won’t invade States to stop unconstitutional stances, why would they invade for a stance that is pro-Constitution?
93 posted on
03/21/2019 3:05:09 AM PDT by
trebb
(Don't howl about illegal leeches while not donating to FR - it's hypocritical.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson