Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: All
[Deputy Assistant Attorney General Hashim Mooppan] said the plaintiffs argue they've suffered injuries
from competition when the emoluments clause was meant as a check against government corruption.

"Nice comeback, Hashim."

16 posted on 03/21/2019 4:43:32 AM PDT by Liz ( Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Liz

See Pelosi > Star Kist Tuna interest > offshore.

Also see Kerry > Heinz interest

Carter > peanuts

Some senator has walnut trees

Etc, etc


17 posted on 03/21/2019 4:46:29 AM PDT by combat_boots (God bless Israel and all who protect and defend her! Merry Christmas! In God We Trust!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Liz
when the emoluments clause was meant as a check against government corruption

This is an idiotic argument and DAG cannot even read the constitution if that is what he said. Here is the emoluments clause in full:

No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.

It's purpose is clearly to prevent foreign influence and as well to prevent the importation of social class titles into the US, which chaffes the Kerry/Clinton crowd to no end who see themselves as the US peerage.

25 posted on 03/21/2019 5:14:26 AM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson