A federal judge respecting the Second Amendment. President Trump should consider promoting this guy.
I carry a stun gun all the time when I go hiking. Why? Because of people who let their dogs run ahead of them on the trail. The dog thinks his job is to clear that trail and you stand a very good chance of a dog attack. A stun gun works great because the electrical crackle backs the dog off. I’ve NEVER actually had to stun a dog, I’ve had 100% success in backing them off by just hearing it. I’ve actually had more problems with owners thinking I’m attempting to do something terrible to their pet and they give me the ole, “He’s a nice dog, he wasn’t doing anything.” BS, I know when a dog is greeting you nicely and when he’s viewing you as a chew toy.
Ping
Finally a judge that understands that “arms” means more than guns. In the time of the founding fathers “arms” were basically anything a citizen required to effectively defend themselves or their country if so required. In the founders day that would have been guns, but it also would have included swords, bayonets, knives, even cannons (if you could afford one). Today that would include all of the above, plus things like body armor, night vision equipment, perhaps even grenades.
This Ping List is for all things pertaining to infringes upon or victories for the 2nd Amendment.
FReepmail me if you want to be added to or deleted from the list.
More 2nd Amendment related articles on FR's Bang List.
Now they need to go after the Safe Act.
One brick at a time.