[OrangeHoof]

You don’t owe any of us an apology sir

Maybe not to you and me but he does owe an apology to the NFL, the New England Patriots organization, his family members and anyone else who's personal reputation is diminished in connection with his name.

Man got needs.

And Man can get needs met without conduct that breaks the law. Do you mean to say a man of his wealth can't get a girlfriend? Can't fly to a country that permits other behaviors? That he can't use other legal forms of getting off? Rubbish.

I understand the urge. There are other ways of dealing with it.

[wardaddy]

Oh please

Lol

You have to be a woman

I’m stil chuckling over your indignation

I could care less if any man goes to a prostitute

That’s tween him and his wife if he has one

[MrEdd]

The NFL openly supports communist activism and disrespect towards law enforcement and military personnel. It is cutting checks to Black Lives Matter groups.

If any apologies are ever owed anywhere by anyone, it is never under any circumstances owed to the NFL no matter what was done.

It is literally not possible to do anything at all which would tarnish what they have openly chosen to become.

[jdsteel]

And Man can get needs met without conduct that breaks the law. Do you mean to say a man of his wealth can't get a girlfriend? Can't fly to a country that permits other behaviors? That he can't use other legal forms of getting off? Rubbish.

Charlie Sheen said “If you are rich or famous you don’t pay a prostitute for sex. You pay a prostitute to LEAVE after sex.”

I am NOT saying what happened was OK but I can understand the motivation of not wanting a woman to come into the picture who might cost him and his family A LOT. And, to never be sure about any woman’s motivations concerning going out with him. There’s also the risk of claims of date rape, etc. etc. etc.

[alexander_busek]

And Man can get needs met without conduct that breaks the law. Do you mean to say a man of his wealth can't get a girlfriend? Can't fly to a country that permits other behaviors? That he can't use other legal forms of getting off? Rubbish. I understand the urge. There are other ways of dealing with it.

Don't wish to insult you, but (to me) that statement smacks of hypocrisy. It namely sounds as though you are saying that his only mistake was in not observing the letter of the law. That the exact same behavior - but in a different country with different laws - would be subject to a different moral interpretation. Or that a similar behavior - ultra-rich guy getting a "girlfriend" (quotation marks intentional) to satisfy his "urges" (your term) would be in a different moral category.

I myself have no position on this case - not ever having heard of this "Robert Kraft" before, and not being familiar with the details of the case.

Regards,