good source:
“it’s very damaging to the President”
_________________
... too ugly/mean/fat to be trusted. Give her another half gallon of ice cream.
Virginia HeffernanVerified account contributing editor @WIRED / columnist
good source:
“it’s very damaging to the President”
Yeah sure it is, thats why he’s not been indicted
It my indeed be. The question is did he do anything illegal? If it did not, then the question becomes was the report written in the least favorable light to President Trump?
I think President Trump could have done better than guys like Manifort and Stone. Those guys were nothing but problems.
From her twitter page:
“Barr’s imminent summary of “principal conclusions” may be very abridged and expurgated.
Should not be considered the “damaging” document that my source says the Mueller report is. Might have to wait for a subpoena from Schiff to see the real thing.”
She writes for Slate, Wired, Mother Jones, Politico etc.
Do you consider those publications “good sources”?
“Very damaging” how? Did the “good source” have anything to say about this?
It will be as damaging as possible with innuendo, smears, and conclusions based upon whatever they could misconstrue or make up. Mueller and his whole team were hired political assassins and they have to deliver the goods. They are short of indictable material, but they will have done everything they can to destroy the President and those around him.
The Heffer has been a hater from the beginning of President Trump’s administration. She has been wrong on most everything from the start. She has no idea what she is talking about.
good source:
“it’s very damaging to the President”
_________________
... too ugly/mean/fat to be trusted. Give her another half gallon of ice cream.