Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/27/2019 6:29:07 AM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
To: ChicagoConservative27

I’d be telling her no, the security risks are too great and dims are not trustworthy. Sorry, Nan, no report for you.


2 posted on 03/27/2019 6:31:00 AM PDT by bk1000 (I stand with Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Question:

Do we know who has actually seen the report? Trump’s people, sure. But do we think the Democrats really know what is in the report? To whom was it distributed and have there been any leaks?

Because the Democrats seem really eager to show it to the American people. Is that a deliberate strategy, or a wild hope that something “good” is in it? Because I’m hoping that the report discusses bad stuff related to Obama and Clinton and that the American people eventually see that bad stuff mostly because the Democrats themselves demand it.

But if Pelosi already knows what is in it, then my hope is forelorn.


3 posted on 03/27/2019 6:33:29 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (If White Privilege is real, why did Elizabeth Warren lie about being an Indian?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Did she ever say this about Bammy and Holder?.......... didn’t think so


4 posted on 03/27/2019 6:33:52 AM PDT by Hyman Roth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Dems have become such pompous asses...well, I guess they always were.


6 posted on 03/27/2019 6:35:30 AM PDT by Magnum44 (My comprehensive terrorism plan: Hunt them down and kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Isn’t Nancy interfering with the independence of the Justice Department, and threatening the sanctity of separation of powers? According to Nancy, I mean. And doesn’t her public questioning amount to Obstruction of Justice, leading to her removal from office? According to Nancy, I mean.


8 posted on 03/27/2019 6:35:50 AM PDT by rightwingcrazy (;-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27
In good time. Her "demand" is unnecessary...and frankly stupid...just "I have Power" rhetoric.

Dems love to make stuff up. They loved Mueller when they "thought" he had something to confirm all the last two years of bullsh**.

Feels just like election night....it's not possible...she lost. Mueller's report says they lost again.

9 posted on 03/27/2019 6:37:17 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27
Nancy, did you appoint Mueller? No.

Did you change the Special Counsel law to include a report to Congress in addition to a report to the AG? No.

Nancy, do you know what "pound sand" means? No.

10 posted on 03/27/2019 6:38:11 AM PDT by Yo-Yo ( is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

After the special prosecutor role was canned congress came up with the special consul position and put some restrictions on what that role would/could make public. Now they want to change the rules. Typical politicians.


11 posted on 03/27/2019 6:39:54 AM PDT by dblshot (I am John Galt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Keep passing green energy bills, like the last one, Nancy! Eventually one or two Senators might vote for it.


12 posted on 03/27/2019 6:39:59 AM PDT by Dixie Yooper (Ephesians 6:11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Let them see it like obummer did. I don’t remember specifically what it was, but you could only see his report or whatever one at a time, kept under lock and key and you could not take notes.
Sure, the Dems will scream and whine, but just keep repeating “that’s how obama did it!


14 posted on 03/27/2019 6:41:56 AM PDT by jeffc (The U.S. media are our enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27
"We don’t need an interpretation by the attorney general, who is appointed for a particular job, to make sure the president is above the law."

Oh.....my.....God....

15 posted on 03/27/2019 6:41:57 AM PDT by ex91B10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

16 posted on 03/27/2019 6:43:40 AM PDT by eaglestar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Nancy wants to be the one to interpret the report.


19 posted on 03/27/2019 6:44:29 AM PDT by Slyfox (Not my circus, not my monkeys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

What a ding bat...Dems sore losers and whiners. They don’t tend to the business of the people. They make up their own rules...I have had it with them and MSM.


20 posted on 03/27/2019 6:45:51 AM PDT by OKITRUMP77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

so all her Committee appointments are ?


21 posted on 03/27/2019 6:45:58 AM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hellinahandcart

Ping.


22 posted on 03/27/2019 6:47:31 AM PDT by sauropod (Yield to sin, and experience chastening and sorrow; yield to God, and experience joy and blessing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Clearly this 79yr old woman’s Depend’s are full and she’s getting cranky.


24 posted on 03/27/2019 6:50:49 AM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie (All I know is what I read in the papers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27
Someone remind Pelosi that in our society, we don't release investigatory materials about someone who wasn't charged with a crime. That would make accusing someone just as bad as convicting someone.

Also, someone should ask Pelosi why Mueller himself hasn't spoken out about Barr's summary of his report? Doesn't that mean that Mueller doesn't dispute it?

-PJ

26 posted on 03/27/2019 6:53:53 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (The 1st Amendment gives the People the right to a free press, not CNN the right to the 1st question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

i know she’s speaker but who gives a damn what she want anymore?
she’s lied so much and inflicted so much damage to our system of representative governance .. and screwed our country so badly...

dear PDJT, just her just scream at the wall now!


28 posted on 03/27/2019 6:56:10 AM PDT by faithhopecharity ( “Politicians are not born; they are excreted.” Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 to 43 BCE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Mueller stated “After Multiple Attempts”?
Mueller stated “I laid out BOTH sides”

If Mueller did his Job, then the entire conspiracy would be laid out in His Official Report, How it began, who ran it, who was involved, who PAID for it...


29 posted on 03/27/2019 6:57:44 AM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson