Were that the case, we wouldn’t have gun control laws.
But we do, because persuasive arguments are made; those must be cut down individually & preemptively,
Winning is more than just being right.
>
Were that the case, we wouldn’t have gun control laws.
>
Correct, we SHOULDN’T have ‘em. Either the Constitution is THE supreme law of the land or you’re conceding we’re a ruled under laws of men.
>
But we do, because persuasive arguments are made
those must be cut down individually & preemptively,
>
‘Persuasive’ has ZERO to do w/ the Constitutionality. The words, and their original context, MEAN something (and easy enough to research/find what the ‘something’ IS).
You’re making the same argument vs. re-instituting slavery, “Well, they HAD (a) good point(s)...”.
>
Winning is more than just being right.
>
We’ll agree to disagree here.