Replies

They can’t keep him off the ballot ... the voters would have to act.. even if it were possible.

They are using an election to try a coup and get back their absolute power... by any means.

This sounds like an effort to deprive the President of his civil rights. Any person has the right to keep his or her tax returns confidential. Other than in a legal proceeding or by court order, the IRS must honor that confidentiality. By passing this law, Illinois is attempting to force the President to do something he legally is not required to do. The consequence of his refusal is the threat to remove him from the ballot, a decision that would have an impact on his ability to conduct his campaign. What would be the next step? Barring the President or his campaign organization from entering the State? As a US citizen who meets the Constitutional qualifications to run for President, the threat to bar him from the ballot is a threat to deprive him of this civil rights.

The Constitution expressly vests in each state's legislature the power to determine how its Electors for President and Vice President are determined. There is no Constitutional obligation upon a state to even have an election, to say the least of provide ballot access to any particular candidate. It is very unlikely that any federal court would invalidate a ballot access requirement such as this one which has at least a nominally non-discriminatory public interest involved.

An court might find a basis in the Illinois state constitution which provides a guarantee of ballot access ... but the Democrats in the legislature could ask a judge to overturn that requirement insofar as the Constitution's grant of authority is specifically to the legislature and there's no evidence that the legislature could, even if it wanted to, divest itself or be divested of the plenary authority over the manner of selection of Electors.