Questions for Chase (Away) Bank

Townhall.com ^ | April 17, 2019 | Michelle Malkin

[Kaslin]

I have been a Chase Bank customer for years. Who knows how much longer it'll be? Will the company's thought police come for me next? How about you? If you are a non-leftist who does business with the financial giant owned by J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., you need to ask questions and get answers.

On Tuesday, investigative journalist James O'Keefe and his Project Veritas team released a disturbing new video on the runaround that Chase officials gave Texas conservative entrepreneur Enrique Tarrio about his canceled account. Big business may very well be enabling America's very own version of the Chinese social credit system in which political dissent is flagged, shunned, punished and eradicated.

First, some background:

Tarrio is a young, peaceful, Afro-Cuban freethinker and chairman of the Proud Boys organization. In February 2019, the Texas Trump supporter received a letter from Chase Bank informing him that "after careful consideration," the financial institution could "no longer support" his banking account. The notice followed a hit piece against minorities who support the president by The Daily Beast, a reliable echo chamber for the discredited Southern Poverty Law Center smear machine.

Tarrio was subsequently kicked off Chase's payment processor, which he used to sell patriotic and pro-Trump T-shirts. Next, he was deplatformed from Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Airbnb, FirstData, Square, Stripe and PayPal before losing his bank accounts. When I asked on Twitter in February why we can't have just one financial institution that doesn't cave to social justice warriors, the official Chase Twitter account tweeted me back:

"Hi Michelle, this article is inaccurate. We did not close his personal account. We do not close accounts based on political affiliation."

I pointed out that Chase's letter clearly stated that the company had closed his account. "So if not for political reasons," I asked, "why, 'after careful consideration,' did you close his account?" The social media manager of Chase's corporate Twitter account, previously so eager to spill the tea, replied: "For privacy reasons, we can't say more."

Thanks to Project Veritas, we now know more. Undercover audio and video exposed how:

--One Chase employee blamed "clerical" issues on Tarrio's account cancellation.

--Another stated: "I see nothing that indicates any reason why the account should be closed. I don't see any outstanding transactions or anything ridiculous."

--Another explained: "Chase is not involved with any like, you know, alt-right people or anything." Those with "no moral character" are people that "the bank usually doesn't get involved with in any "business relationships, period."

--Several repeated a company line in Tarrio's mysterious file: "Decision is not reversible."

Others who received Chase shutdown notices so far in 2019: conservative Rebel Media contributor Martina Markota, anti-sharia and pro-borders investigative journalist Laura Loomer and U.S. Army combat vet and vocal Trump supporter Joe Biggs. Were Markota's, Loomer's and Biggs' removals "clerical" errors or unfounded or were they based on an ideological litmus test disguised as a "moral character" assessment?

More questions arise:

How exactly is J.P. Morgan Chase's $500,000 donation last year to the SPLC left-wing operatives being put to use?

Why did the company embrace a known defamation racket whose stated mission is to "destroy" its political enemies on the right?

What comment does Chase have now that SPLC's top leaders have been purged amid internal accusations of intolerance and discrimination within the walls of the notorious Poverty Palace?

Does Chase keep tabs on high-profile conservative customers' political speech on social media platforms?

Is Chase operating from the same playbook as Paypal, which is booting off conservatives in consultation with the SPLC? One of its most recent victims: Luke Rohlfing, a young reporter for BigLeaguePolitics.com, who had exposed how the payment processor was allowing Open Borders Inc. heavyweight Pueblo Sin Fronteras to raise money for illegal immigrant caravans conspiring to break our immigration laws -- even though Paypal's own terms of service state clearly that users may not engage in any activities that "violate any law, statute, ordinance or regulation."

Tarrio warns of the speech-squelching pattern emerging across Silicon Valley and on Wall Street: "First we get silenced on social media, then Paypal, then I get debanked. It's a very dangerous trend."

He is not alone. Former Toronto mayoral candidate and social media commentator Faith Goldy told me: "To date I've been banned from: PayPal, Patreon, GoFundMe, Airbnb, Facebook and Instagram. I've committed no crime! My only fault is loving my country and quoting government statistics to a camera from my kitchen table. The nature of big tech censorship is imperialistic and these Silicon Valley nerds won't stop until every freethinker is snuffed or scared into submission."

As for Chase Bank, I sent all my questions to chief communications officer Patricia Wexler, who challenged the authenticity of one of the employees recorded by Veritas (O'Keefe showed proof of the Chase New York media relations number dialed and had audio of the employee identifying himself as a Chase rep) and ignored the substance of the report.

Evasion and denial are surefire ways to lose business. Is it Chase Bank or Chase Away Bank? Inquiring customers would like to know.

[HighSierra5]

Commies in the board room. The final tactic of the left. Hard to beat. But not impossible.

[Socon-Econ]

Banks must be absolutely prohibited from political discrimination against customers engaging in lawful business, and they should bear heavy burden of showing that any customer’s activity is unlawful BEFORE thay refuse to serve.

[cdcdawg]

“Big business may very well be enabling America’s very own version of the Chinese social credit system in which political dissent is flagged, shunned, punished and eradicated.”

The HR department of your employer is likely to the left of the Humanities department of your local college. It’s not 1995 anymore. Reflexively siding with big business is something that the GOP and conservatism need to leave behind.

[ptsal]

Since Chase is the main bank offered by Amazon, how long will it be before Amazon limits the selection list of items offered?

Hopefully, Walmart jumps all over this opportunity.

[EQAndyBuzz]

‘Commies in the board room. The final tactic of the left. “

I bet those in the board room have no idea this is going on.

[Vendome]

There has to be a way to hit them with some sort of RICO but, I can’t think of a law they broke...

You can’t have one company perform an adverse act and mysteriously several others follow suit.

[Skywise]

If you recall it was Amazon was the first company to ban selling the confederate flag.

[ptsal]

Thank you for the reminder.

[Wuli]

I think EVERY Conservative, Libertarian or truly Christian man should join Proud Boys. Everyone. Then altogether we should tell Chase and the other “scared to death of the left” corporate pansies to go to hell.

[gaijin]

We are OCCUPIED:

A foreign force dominates us, represses us.

They don’t share the value set that built the country.

Now they sap our energy, suck off our blood like leeches.

They have exactly replicated the conditions that they decry having once existed against them; it was wrong then, it is wrong now.

Hollywood, the media, now banking —the decades-long complaints for each of those have different lyrics, but the tune is exactly the same.

How many wars in which the enemy is never identified are won..?

[gaijin]

[Wuli]

When you “Google” Proud Boys (just the title all by itself) the two items that are at the top of the search results are an entry from the Southern Poverty Law Center followed by the Proud Boys page on Wikipedia - both of which describe the Proud Boys as “far right Neo-Fascist” organization bent on violence. Then in the special column on the right side of the page (where Google presents something they want to feature), you have the opening part of the Wiki entry (which is clear had zero participation by anyone in the Proud Boys).

Proud Boys is suing the SPLC for defamation. I think they ought to add Google and Wiki to that suit.

[bgill]

Can’t stomach Chase. Dumped them 30 years ago. They’re crooks and wanted Soros as their CEO.

[Ancesthntr]

“You can’t have one company perform an adverse act and mysteriously several others follow suit.”

---

Conspiracy to engage in a tortious interference in another’s business.

[Jack Hammer]

Michelle Malkin is one of the most gorgeous, insightful, talented, and brilliant women on Planet Earth, but.... she banks at Chase????

[ArmstedFragg]

The process provides an illustration of how regulators can be misused by political interests. Back in the Obama administration, regulators started looking at "customer quality" as they rated banks. It was originally considered to be an attempt to de-bank drug dealers and the like. About five years ago, it was extended to "moral character", which resulted in almost everybody in the adult entertainment business losing their bank accounts. So apparently Chase is using SPLC in making "moral character" decisions now. All done without any law being passed, all with a wink and nod. A useful example of what happens when you allow people with a little authority to run loose.

"But man, proud man, Dress'd in a little brief authority, Most ignorant of what he's most assur'd— His glassy essence—like an angry ape Plays such fantastic tricks before high heaven As makes the angels weep; who, with our spleens, Would all themselves laugh mortal." ― William Shakespeare, Measure for Measure

[ArmstedFragg]

They’re doing it at the behest of government regulators.