Posted on 04/17/2019 10:49:40 AM PDT by Red Badger
Man’s Chase Payment Processing Shut Down, Suspects Political Targeting of Provocative Conservative Merchandising Chase Bank Unable to Produce Reason for Account Termination Chase Corporate Global Media Relations: “Chase is not involved with any like, you know, alt-right people” Other Conservative Voices and Chase Bank Customers Also ‘Debanked’ Recently
UPDATE: Chase Bank Communications Officer Patricia Wexler responded to this report, saying: “We do not close accounts due to political affiliation. Despite what was described in the video, that was NOT someone from Global Corporate Media Relations. As I’m sure you can appreciate, I’m not able to share any personal details on anyone’s individual or business account.”
(Washington DC) Project Veritas has released a video report (the full 10 minute version can be found below) about a man whose Chase bank account was shut down without being given a reason. The report, which includes testimony from Enrique Tarrio, the man whose Chase account was terminated, features undercover video of conversations with bank professionals discussing the account’s closure.
Said Project Veritas founder James O’Keefe,
“Are there unwritten Chase policies that Mr. Tarrio and others were in breach of? ‘Debanking’ appears to be a new frontier in American politics.”
Insiders can contact Project Veritas here.
Before the account’s termination, Tarrio, whose website sells provocative conservative merchandise, spoke to Chase bank professionals. Tarrio says that phone operators for Chase were unable to explain why his business account was being terminated.
Conversations in various Chase bank offices were recorded and provided to Project Veritas.
Multiple Chase account and bank managers were unable to assist Tarrio, saying that inquiries regarding the closure of his business account would have to be directed to the “executive office.”
Said one of the Chase bankers, Marcel Smith:
“I see nothing that indicates any reason why the account should be closed, I don’t see any outstanding transactions or anything ridiculous.”
Chase bank typically gives its customers a reason for account closures, says Smith:
“I’ve never seen them not give a response to someone whose account they had closed.”
An analyst from the Chase executive office, Nora, told Tarrio that his account was being closed for various clerical issues. In a phone conversation with Nora, which was published by Project Veritas, Tarrio clarifies there were no clerical issues.
“The Right Relationship is Everything”
Undercover audio from a conversation with a Chase employee working in Chase Corporate Global Media Relations reveal that Chase bank makes political judgments about their customers.
JOURNALIST: I don’t want to do business with anyone who does business with Steve Bannon, or any of these alt right people, and that’s just one of my prerequisites.
CHASE: Right, right. As far as I’m concerned, we’re not connected with Steve Bannon.
JOURNALIST: Do you have standards in place that would preempt such relationship with anyone, um of Steve Bannon’s –
CHASE: Oh definitely. Definitely, definitely.
JOURNALIST: That’s what I’m calling to inquire about. Tell me more.
CHASE: Right so I mean, Chase is not involved with any like, you know, alt right people or anything. I really can’t name names but it’s basically like we don’t get involved with any of that…
JOURNALIST: … I don’t expect for you guys, I’m not talking about who you guys give money to –
CHASE: No, just any business relationships, period.
JOURNALIST: Really? Okay… So I mean on my end I’m talking about people like Trump supporters for instance. The MAGA, whatever – make, whatever the hell they, those types of people, I mean individuals –
CHASE: Right, right. I know what you mean, but like I said the call is being recorded, monitored, so I can’t get too political. And say I don’t support these people, or this, but you know, any kind of business entity, people like that, no moral character or anything like that, the bank usually doesn’t get involved with that.”
Project Veritas founder James O’Keefe believes that transparency could clear up issues like Mr. Tarrio’s. In order to investigate more issues, Project Veritas receives tips from insiders in technology, government, education, and other professional fields here. Full 10-Minute Video:
I am, too. Will be checking on offers from the credit union.
Bankruptcy only costs $999.
Big banks do not consider “our” money to be ours anyway. It’s just on loan to us on a double secret probationary rate.
Something they may want to consider. They may be “Too Big To Fail” but in a country that itself is failing that don’t mean a lot.
There is another option. We are already seeing the beginnings of it. Blue cities telling the Feds screw off when it comes to immigration. Red county Sheriffs telling the Feds to screw off when it comes to guns. What is the Fed gonna do when everybody tells them to screw off for everything? Let the Federal gummint just die back to what it was 200 years ago. A very small part of civic life. The county and state governments were where all the power and money were. If blue cities want to destroy themselves with their own money who cares? Let them.
If what you’re saying is true, I’d be all for it. But I’m skeptical about the reality of people giving the Feds a middle-finger without consequences. The political Left seems to get less friction from the judiciary, so their policies seem to get enforced by the Feds more easily. It seems to be policies that conservatives care about that never seem to attain “escape velocity”. The trend of U.S. history since the Civil War has been an ever increasingly powerful Federal gov’t. I’m not confident at all that the trend is reversing.
Happy Birthday!
Thank you!
It’s the only way I can see out of this impasse without having to kill them.
Define “alt-right.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.