[jazusamo]

Seems to me AG Barr has made "a reasonable accommodation" already.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

They know Barr is setting them up to be prosecuted when they leak.

[rockinqsranch]

And while we are all focused on this fabricated diversion the real issue of the day is being ignored, and that is thousands of invaders are SUCCESSFULLY (with our government’s help) crossing our Southern border, and taking what is ours.

In spite of all the rhetoric we are being invaded, and nothing is being done other than lip service, and pissing at one another over a fabricated con job that doesn’t even have a title. FBI-Gate, or maybe Obama-Gate, or perhaps Demo-Gate. Every other scandal, or every other breach of law, morals, ethics, or protocol gets named, but this one is just Scandal Doe.

Knowing our “government” knows who is the BIG money, the BIG brains behind this foreign invasion yet THEY, whoever they may be ARE WINNING. Bush, Clinton, Obama are winning. WE ARE LOSING.

[Major Matt Mason]

The Democrats note that while they won't accept this offer, they are willing to work with Barr to reach an "a reasonable accommodation" so that the DOJ can continue to "protect law enforcement sensitive information, while allowing lawmakers to review information they view as necessary in order to conduct their oversight responsibilities.

Oh, well, isn't that big of these criminals. This should be Barr's final offer.

[a fool in paradise]

Stay sick
Turn blue
FOrats

[july4thfreedomfoundation]

“Oversight responsibilities” my a$$!

The demo-craps only want this information in order to continue their unjustified and unwarranted harassment of President Trump.

Who do they think they’re kidding?

[wastedyears]

which among other things would prohibit discussion of the full report, even with other Committee Members

As if they would abide by that anyway.

[5th MEB]

Keep the party small, that way when it leaks to all the alphabet networks your pool of SUSPECTS is small enough to sweat.

[trebb]

And Barr also wants to have a small enough pool to be able to bitch slap the inevitable leakers...they don’t like that.

[Eleutheria5]

“Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif), Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and the top Democrats on the Intelligence and Judiciary committees in both chambers argued in a letter on Friday that Barr’s offer is too rigid. They said the number of lawmakers who can review the redacted text is too small, and they took issue with not being able to see all the information, including grand jury material.”

Well, chuck you, Farley. In your nussy, Pancy. Why don’t you make some more obscene noises about the ‘rule of law’ to project your own lawlessness onto Barr.

[DainBramage]

I hope the redactions are cases against democrats and it get introduced to the public that way.