Posted on 04/22/2019 11:01:49 AM PDT by janetjanet998
he top Republican on the House Judiciary Committee on Monday announced he had reviewed a less-redacted version of special counsel Robert Mueller's investigative report, which comes after top House Democrats rejected an offer to do so.
Rep. Doug Collins (R-Ga.) hailed the version he reviewed in a secure Department of Justice (DOJ) room as further supporting the idea that President Trump committed no wrongdoing, pointing to the core conclusions Attorney General William Barr sent to Congress last month.
Hey, a republican saying the right thing.
And there were others the other day.
Along with Barr as AG now, my hope is returning.
This calls for a drink!!
Then again, what doesn’t???
We don’t need to do all this secret agent, redacted business.
All we need to do is trust in the deceitful, illegal snooping and hatred that the media has for Trump.
If there was even any double-secret dirt on Trump.....it would have been leaked by now.
Hasn’t happened, everybody relax.
Now can we get on with the criminal investigation of Comey and his cohorts?
It's Schrödinger's Report.
If the DemocRATs don't look at the less-redacted report, it can simultaneously show collusion and obstruction, and show there was no collusion or obstruction.
Democrats just want to keep the waters muddy enough that their fanbois will believe everything they tell them.
“I encourage Chairman Nadler and Democrat leaders to view this material as soon as possible — unless they’re afraid to acknowledge the facts this report outlines,” Collins concluded.
Its hilarious how these people want the non redacted version of the report..the majority of the report we already saw, what do they expect the not redacted version to show, that Trump speaks fluent Russian LOL
Nope. Nadler and the Dems will continue to ask for something they know they cannot by law receive - the complete, unredacted report.
Then they will use the continued refusal to paint Barr as a Trump Fanboi.
Couple of points. Of course it’s insane the Democrats would refuse to view more information and shows they are pure evil.
But also they have to view this in a secure location. I think Nadler and the others are lazy shits who have no interest in actually having to read something.
What’s in there the Dims don’t want to see? Were the Russian prostitutes peeing on . . . Jerry Nadler?
I’d like to see Nadler’s face if/when Mueller pleads for 5th Amendment protections, a la Lois Lerner.
Schrodingers cat perfectly describes the democrats and media.
There is a precedent
As I recall all the evidence for the Clinton impeachment was similarly gathered and presented.
No Rats went to look
Do. Do not Review.
Republicans who DO are extinct.
Democrats who do evil are omnipresent.
I knew this would happen as soon as the Dems said “no thanks”. Now they look even dumber because the R’s can play the game of “I know more than you do”.
These people are stupid.
Don’t let Mittens see it or he’ll be so “sickened” he may throw up on it.
why is so much redacted in part 1? (collusion).. the IG report..... for example...
That there’s an appetite killer :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.