Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Lie, a Myth and a Question
Townhall.com ^ | May 1, 2019 | John Stossel

Posted on 05/01/2019 2:32:18 AM PDT by Kaslin

Socialists like Bernie Sanders tell us that "the rich get richer, and the poor get poorer."

That's a lie.

Yes, rich people got absurdly rich. Last year, says Oxfam, "the wealth of the world's billionaires increased (by) $2.5 billion a day."

I say, so what?

The poor did not get poorer. Bernie's wrong about that. The poor are much better off.

"As we've increased the number of billionaires around the world, extreme poverty has shrunk," says former investment banker Carol Roth in my video about inequality.

She is right. Over the past 30 years, more than a billion people climbed out of extreme poverty. Thanks to capitalism, more than a billion people no longer struggle to survive on a few pennies a day.

Bernie is correct when he says that the wealth gap between rich and poor grew. In America over the last 40 years, the richest people got 200 percent richer, while poor Americans got just 32 percent richer. But again, so what?

Gaining 32 percent is a very good thing (all these numbers are adjusted for inflation).

Everyone's better off, despite the improvement not being even. It never is.

Now the myth:

The media claim in America there's "a lack of income mobility" -- that people born poor are likely to stay poor.

Some do. It's true that people with rich parents have a big advantage. But it's a myth that Americans are locked into their economic class.

Economists at Harvard and Berkeley crunched the numbers and found most people born to the richest fifth of Americans fell out of that bracket within 20 years.

Likewise, most born to the poorest fifth climb to a higher quintile. Some make it all the way to the top.

In fact, says Roth, "3 out of 4 Americans will hit that top 20 percent at some point in their lifetime."

You see America's income mobility on the Forbes richest list. Most of the billionaires are self-made. They didn't inherit money. They created their wealth.

Still, the very rich are ridiculously rich. The Forbes billionaires have more money than the bottom 64 percent of the U.S. population.

"Unfair!" say the progressives. "It doesn't matter if nearly everyone got richer, income inequality itself is a huge problem."

It's "threatening to tear us apart!" says New York City Mayor Bill De Blasio.

It might, if people come to believe that inequality itself is evil. But one question: Why is that true?

Progressives like to point out that in Scandinavian countries, people say they are happier than Americans. Scandinavians have more equal incomes than Americans.

But that proves nothing. Incomes are more equal in Afghanistan, too. Incomes are more equal when everyone is poor.

Forget money for a moment and think about how impossible it would be to make everyone equal.

I'll never sing as well as Adele or play basketball like LeBron. The best athletes, singers, dancers, etc., are just physically different. I'll never be as self-confident as Donald Trump or as verbally smooth as AOC.

"There's inequality in everything. There's inequality in free time, inequality in parents. I don't have any parents or grandparents," says Roth. "I have two kidneys. There are people out there who need one, don't have one that functions. Should the government take my kidney because somebody else needs it?"

I suggest to her that some people having so much more than others is just inherently unfair.

"Life is unfair!" she replied. "Unfair is good. Unfair is a feature. It's not a bug!"

Certainly, it's wrong if government makes rules that create inequality.

Racist laws forbidding some ethnic groups to do business where they please, or restricting where they live, are evil.

So are government subsidies to rich people and well-connected corporations.

But allowing people to be different from one another, to employ their unique talents and succeed or fail by them, to rise as high as the market will bear -- that's an important part of freedom.

We won't all end up in the same place, but most of us will be more prosperous than if government decided our limits.

And we will be freer.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: wealth

1 posted on 05/01/2019 2:32:18 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Bernie is that used car salesman that’s trying to sell you a car with no doors and no wheels


2 posted on 05/01/2019 2:34:58 AM PDT by ronnie raygun (nicdip.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

l8r


3 posted on 05/01/2019 2:42:07 AM PDT by preacher ( Journalism no longer reports news, they use news to shape our society.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Being responsible for your student loans is a burden.

Being responsible for every one elses student loans is slavery!

4 posted on 05/01/2019 3:09:08 AM PDT by rawcatslyentist ("All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin; All
All true and Sanders is just recycling old bad ideas. The problem is the structure of the economy has changed for the worse. Much of it is globalist manipulation based on price advantage for off shoring manufacturing with the idea the stupid Americans will be happy to buy consumer junk using consumer credit while their economy is ruined. A city such as Kankakee Illinois is a great example. More than half its industrial base has gone and the city has been over run by welfare blacks from Crook County. The high school has gone from an excellent place to learn to a gang dominated sewer right out of Compton. The strip mining of the economy has led to a lot of the opioid and meth epidemic. Guys don't do well with nothing to do. If the leftist used this to stoke working and lower middle class rage they might get somewhere. Of course they are in Wall Street's pocket so not likely. More whining about muzzards and ‘sexual minorities’ instead.
5 posted on 05/01/2019 3:22:34 AM PDT by robowombat (Orthodox)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Anyone who believes the accumulation of wealth is a zero sum game is a moron and hardly worthy of the time needed to explain it to them.


6 posted on 05/01/2019 3:35:25 AM PDT by billyboy15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Stossel is absolutely right, for human beings wealth is NOT a zero sum game. The “piece of the pie” that someone has does not have to come from someone else. There is no limit to the size of the pie.

For animals, dependent on the resources of the natural world, wealth IS a zero sum game.

Unfortunately, human beings are also wired with tens of thousands of years of existence, telling them to fight over the last scrap of meat around the fire. This is based on animal existence.

In modern man, the animal wiring is the enabler of political causes like Socialism, Comunism and Unionism. Playing on those animal drives can work well, for some people.

I have dogs, and you can always see some percentage more worried about what the other dog has in his bowl than they are happy with their own.


7 posted on 05/01/2019 3:42:45 AM PDT by Empire_of_Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Bernie and his followers think it's just fine for those who didn't attend college because they couldn't afford it and were smart enough to realize that going in debt to get a college degree wasn't worth the price to help pay the bills run up by those who did assume a huge debt to go to college.

Given the fact that a significant percentage of our society looks at the world that way, we're teetering on the edge of a major, and probably violent, change that will shock the crowd who think they can sell anything to the deplorable masses.

JMHo

8 posted on 05/01/2019 4:13:34 AM PDT by Rashputin (Jesus Christ doesn't evacuate His troops, He leads them to victory !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I like Townhall.com there are some pretty decent editorial writers there.

That being said, sometimes they tend to move one way or the other off into left field. Like me, I do that all that time. This article is a good example.

Bernie is bat-sh@t crazy and a danger to what remains of our tattered republic. Never the less, you have to look at the full scope of things as they are and to get so absorbed in politics that you lose track of your own personal reality and life.


9 posted on 05/01/2019 4:14:57 AM PDT by vannrox (The Preamble to the Bill of Rights - without it, our Bill of Rights is meaningless!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The only problem I have with billionaires is when they use their wealth to push their personal ideology and agenda on the rest of us - e.g. Soros.
10 posted on 05/01/2019 4:36:55 AM PDT by neverevergiveup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

To liberals and socialists, life is a zero-sum game. In order for someone to get rich, someone else has to get poor.

It is the same as their position that cutting taxes reduces inflows to the government. Everything is static. Nothing is dynamic.

Friggin’ Morons, all!


11 posted on 05/01/2019 4:42:05 AM PDT by Redleg Duke (We live on a tax farm as free-range humans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

A rising tide lifts ALL boats!!

Only a brain dead moron doesn’t get that.


12 posted on 05/01/2019 5:54:38 AM PDT by SMARTY ("Nobility is defined by the demands it makes on us - by obligations, not by rights".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson