Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anita Hill slams Biden in op-ed, claims Dem might have slowed #MeToo by decades
Fox News ^ | May 09 2019 | Danielle Wallace

Posted on 05/10/2019 12:45:34 AM PDT by knighthawk

Anita Hill took aim at Joe Biden once again Thursday, arguing that the #MeToo movement against sexual misconduct might have begun sooner if the Democratic Party's 2020 front-runner would have done a better job of handling her claims of sexual harassment against Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas more than 30 years ago.

Writing in the New York Times, Hill slammed the former vice president and U.S. senator from Delaware, who was chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee in 1991 when Hill accused Thomas of sexual harassment during his Supreme Court confirmation process.

“If the Senate Judiciary Committee, led then by Mr. Biden, had done its job and held a hearing that showed that its members understood the seriousness of sexual harassment and other forms of sexual violence, the cultural shift we saw in 2017 after #MeToo might have began [sic] in 1991 — with the support of the government,” Hill, who is now a professor at Brandeis University, wrote.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: anitahill; joebiden; metoo
We need to get some more popcorn!
1 posted on 05/10/2019 12:45:34 AM PDT by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: knighthawk; Impy; BillyBoy; LS; Clemenza; NFHale; GOPsterinMA; SunkenCiv; dp0622; dfwgator

What is this creepy, perjuring bitch going on about ? Does anyone not remember the 1992 “Year of the Woman” which sent the most execrable ultraleft Demonrat harpies to high office (including the Butcheress of Benghazi and her rapist hubby) ?


2 posted on 05/10/2019 12:51:18 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (BUTTGIGGITY ! It's an anal thing. You wouldn't understand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

I love it when the left eats its own. Time to buy more popcorn futures when the market opens this morning.


3 posted on 05/10/2019 12:51:32 AM PDT by wjcsux (The hyperventilating of the left means we are winning! (Tagline courtesy of Laz.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

Does this woman think she did no harm? She tried to destroy a good man...for the world to see. She is owed no apology but she owes one and more to Justice Thomas


4 posted on 05/10/2019 12:55:38 AM PDT by frnewsjunkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

5 posted on 05/10/2019 12:56:02 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

Why doesn’t she retire, and spend more time with her family.


6 posted on 05/10/2019 1:00:13 AM PDT by Cowboy Bob ("Other People's Money" = The life blood of Liberalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

In a way she’s right. By parading all these fake claims, like hers and the bitches against Kavenaugh, conservatives, be them like me [and probably most of you] look much more critically regarding ‘claims’ made by women against men, be it when we vote, or even if we’re on juries.

...although I doubt that was what she was getting at.


7 posted on 05/10/2019 1:10:39 AM PDT by BobL (I eat at McDonald's and shop at Walmart - I just don't tell anyone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
One of the first articles I read by Thomas Sowell was his explanation of why Anita Hill was lying.

Fatal Facts: Setting History Straight

"The really fatal fact about Anita Hill’s accusations was that they were first made to the Senate Judiciary Committee in confidence, and she asked that her name not be mentioned when the accusations were presented to Judge Thomas by those trying to pressure him to withdraw his nomination to the Supreme Court.

"Think about it: The accusations referred to things that were supposed to have happened when only two people were present.

Comments "If the accusations were true, Clarence Thomas would automatically know who originated them. Anita Hill’s request for anonymity made sense only if the charges were false."

8 posted on 05/10/2019 1:23:07 AM PDT by Widget Jr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frnewsjunkie

She was owed a prison sentence for perjury. She was a creepy stalker of Thomas, following him from job to job. Never got over being rejected by him.


9 posted on 05/10/2019 1:24:00 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (BUTTGIGGITY ! It's an anal thing. You wouldn't understand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

Anita Hill would have a tough time explaining evangelicals to Joe Biden. Oral Roberts University


10 posted on 05/10/2019 1:57:51 AM PDT by Scram1 (an)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Anita Hill is now playing to the historical ignorance of the woke generation and utter corruption of the media. What is her complaint about Biden? That he should have held a hearing to explore her accusations? And does she think no one will remember that she was the one who refused to come forward publicly, which is why the Senate Judiciary Committee did not use her testimony during the nomination hearings? Her statements now are a brazen rewriting of history.
11 posted on 05/10/2019 3:09:20 AM PDT by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

Anyone who believes Democrats/liberals/progressives are actually on women’s (or blacks’ or immigrants’) side, for the actual good of those people, knows not the left.


12 posted on 05/10/2019 3:18:15 AM PDT by polymuser (Hi It is terrible to contemplate how few politicians are hanged today. - Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

Monica and the other women used by Bill and Shillary are waiting to hear from you, Anita.


13 posted on 05/10/2019 3:41:27 AM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

” . . . might have begun sooner if the ... front-runner would have done a better job . . .”

Not good English, Danielle. Not good at all, Fox.


14 posted on 05/10/2019 4:27:56 AM PDT by Chad N. Freud (FR is the modern equivalent of the Committees of Correspondence. Let other analogies arise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

Pervert Joe Biden INTENTIONALLY SWAM IN THE NUDE IN FRONT OF NUMEROUS FEMALE SECRET SERVICE AGENTS ASSIGNED TO PROTECT HIM! And he is the Demon Rat party’s lead candidate.

These phonies are such utter hypocrites; so munch for the “me too” movement.


15 posted on 05/10/2019 4:31:16 AM PDT by Jmouse007 (Lord God Almighty, deliver us from this evil in the name of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Anita Hill slams Biden in op-ed, claims Dem might have slowed #MeToo by decades

What's wrong with slowing down PoundMeToo?

16 posted on 05/10/2019 4:42:30 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux - The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

Slowed.............?

Ya mean that’s a BAD THING??


17 posted on 05/10/2019 5:45:35 AM PDT by Flintlock ("FIRST the Saturday people, THEN the Sunday people"--gee whatever do they mean by that?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jmouse007

Wonder if Dan Bongino was around during this time. If he was, I wish he would mention it.


18 posted on 05/10/2019 6:37:00 AM PDT by Inspectorette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

Slow Joe is going down. The Left is going to kneecap him, and Anita will be first in line wielding a Louisville Slugger.


19 posted on 05/10/2019 7:30:47 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

She’s milked her lying for decades... her income depends on her being a victim, don’t think she’s going to stop now.


20 posted on 05/10/2019 7:31:53 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson