I know this is a UK source, but what the heck.
YAY.
What the (blank) has taken so darned long?????
1 posted on
05/21/2019 9:45:38 PM PDT by
cba123
To: cba123
2 posted on
05/21/2019 9:46:23 PM PDT by
cba123
( Toi la nguoi My. Toi bay gio o Viet Nam.)
To: cba123
They’ve got plans for your money until 2093.
4 posted on
05/21/2019 9:51:54 PM PDT by
SpaceBar
To: SunkenCiv
5 posted on
05/21/2019 9:56:57 PM PDT by
fieldmarshaldj
(Who will think of the gerbils ? Just say no to Buttgiggity !)
To: cba123
Another Sun post.
Alrighty, then.
Let’s put it in perspective:
IMHO: This was the launching of challenge to the Chinese to expend resources in a ‘race to the moon’...
Sound familiar?
Frankly, the Moon is the sane choice considering the ‘insane’ (Mars).
7 posted on
05/21/2019 10:12:39 PM PDT by
logi_cal869
(-cynicus the "concern troll" a/o 10/03/2018 /!i!! &@$%&*(@ -)
To: cba123
In terms of energy requirements, it is much easier to mine, refine, manufacture, and launch stuff from the moon to Low Earth Orbit (LEO) (distance approx 300,000 km) than trying to do the same from Earth to LEO (less than 300 km).
9 posted on
05/21/2019 10:26:27 PM PDT by
Dundee
(They gave up all their tomorrows for our today's.)
To: cba123
What the (blank) has taken so darned long?????
21 posted on
05/22/2019 12:32:10 AM PDT by
vannrox
(The Preamble to the Bill of Rights - without it, our Bill of Rights is meaningless!)
To: cba123
So this is why they said the next astronauts to the moon will be women:
33 posted on
05/22/2019 11:39:45 AM PDT by
Magnum44
(My comprehensive terrorism plan: Hunt them down and kill them)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson