Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/22/2019 10:20:46 AM PDT by UMCRevMom@aol.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
To: UMCRevMom@aol.com

I have mixed feelings. Here in California it may get conservatives who normally don’t vote (since it is a hopeless cause here in California) to the polls. Of course with illegal aliens voting and vote harvesting it is probably still a list cause.


38 posted on 05/22/2019 11:03:32 AM PDT by willk (A bias news media is not a free press.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: UMCRevMom@aol.com

The country should be split up anyway. Let the liberal states die on the vine


39 posted on 05/22/2019 11:05:05 AM PDT by Carry me back (Cut the feds by 90%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: UMCRevMom@aol.com
So what if they are expressly attempting to circumvent Article 1 Section 10, Article 2 Section 1, Article 4 Section 4, Article 5, and the 12th Amendment to the Constitution?

The Constitution now says whatever the hell any 5 out of 9 Supreme Court Justices want it to say at any point in time.

42 posted on 05/22/2019 11:08:18 AM PDT by Bubba_Leroy (The Obamanation has ended!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: UMCRevMom@aol.com

The SCOTUS needs to knock down this nonsense ASAP. States don’t get to make changes to the Constitution of their own volition.


43 posted on 05/22/2019 11:09:26 AM PDT by Antoninus ("In Washington, swamp drain you.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: UMCRevMom@aol.com

If Trump won the popular vote but lost Nevada and was just 8EV shy of the 270 needed to clinch, this would be poetic justice. In fact, I’d dearly wish that such a scenario happens.


45 posted on 05/22/2019 11:13:57 AM PDT by SeekAndFind (look at Michigan, it will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: UMCRevMom@aol.com

How exactly do they plan to reach 270 by next year?

Which states get them to 270?

If they can get to 270 , then a Democrat will already win those sames states the Constitutional way.

JUst calm down.


48 posted on 05/22/2019 11:22:24 AM PDT by SMGFan ("God love ya! What am I talking about")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: UMCRevMom@aol.com
Not Constitutional
53 posted on 05/22/2019 11:27:02 AM PDT by fortheDeclaration
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: UMCRevMom@aol.com

This seems so obviously to disenfranchise a state’s voters. How can that be constitutional?


56 posted on 05/22/2019 11:29:06 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: UMCRevMom@aol.com

Does this mean a Federal Voter ID will be implemented since these Traitorous State Legislatures are colluding with each other?

I recall the Southern States agreed to collude back in the 1860’s.


57 posted on 05/22/2019 11:34:24 AM PDT by Kickass Conservative (THEY LIVE, and we're the only ones wearing the Sunglasses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: UMCRevMom@aol.com

That map looks like what the country in the Hunger Games might look like.

All the “small” states in the middle that have no vote must produce and provide for those in the other four states.


61 posted on 05/22/2019 11:43:00 AM PDT by 21twelve (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: UMCRevMom@aol.com

President Snow from The Hunger games approves.


62 posted on 05/22/2019 11:45:38 AM PDT by EdnaMode
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: UMCRevMom@aol.com; AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; Bockscar; ...
The compact would take effect after states totaling 270 electoral votes, and with Nevada, the total would reach 195.
from the other topic I saw.

65 posted on 05/22/2019 11:51:01 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: UMCRevMom@aol.com

If this compact passes, expect them to do a neck-breaking about face in repealing their law if Trump wins the popular vote.


67 posted on 05/22/2019 11:56:06 AM PDT by fwdude (Think about it: Blacks were made slaves in Africa, but were made free men in America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: UMCRevMom@aol.com

these idiots will be the first to scream for a lawsuit if Trump wins the popular vote. Trump may end up with 500 electoral votes if he does win the popular vote. And these are all Democrat states shooting themselves in the foot so actually not one thing has changed.


68 posted on 05/22/2019 11:58:16 AM PDT by Midwesterner53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: UMCRevMom@aol.com
This will end any chance that candidates will ever visit small lightly populated states. Why ever go to Nevada when the heavy harvest of votes in the top ten states will determine how Nevada’s electoral votes go? Ditto Maine, Vermont, New Hampshire, Nebraska, Iowa, Montana, Dakotas, Hawaii, DC., etc.
70 posted on 05/22/2019 12:08:01 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard (Power is more often surrendered than seized.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: UMCRevMom@aol.com

As the article alludes, if this passes Constitutional muster there will be a big rise in 3rd (and 4th and 5th and 6th) parties. Individual candidates and parties will campaign heavily in just a small number of states, such that no single person will ever win the popular vote by more than 50%. Imagine how the country will react when a person who got 35% of the vote is ‘anointed’ by these states.


71 posted on 05/22/2019 12:10:33 PM PDT by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: UMCRevMom@aol.com

As the article alludes, if this passes Constitutional muster there will be a big rise in 3rd (and 4th and 5th and 6th) parties. Individual candidates and parties will campaign heavily in just a small number of states, such that no single person will ever win the popular vote by more than 50%. Imagine how the country will react when a person who got 35% of the vote is ‘anointed’ by these states.


72 posted on 05/22/2019 12:10:35 PM PDT by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: UMCRevMom@aol.com

This magnifies the reason why if we do not get elections purified to have required picture ID plus voting on one day with no absentee ballots except for military and no early or late voting and no mail in ballots and requirements that voters must show up at the polls in person and be verified by positive ID, the Republicans have won their last national election. As it is the largest SocialDemocrat controlled city in each state will determine the total vote for the state, which in Republican states will be a significantly higher vote total than eligible voters in the state. The concept was dry run in 2016 and 18 in a few states and received no actual blowback i.e. they got away with it clean. It will be done with wild abandon in 2020 and the Republicans can be counted on to simply accept their total extinction in national politics.


73 posted on 05/22/2019 12:12:25 PM PDT by arthurus (c v bmmm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

Domocrars coming up with a new way to cheat on National Elections.


80 posted on 05/22/2019 12:27:56 PM PDT by Retvet (Retvet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: UMCRevMom@aol.com

This won’t hold up in the courts.


81 posted on 05/22/2019 12:30:41 PM PDT by al_c (Democrats: Party over Common Sense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson