Posted on 05/22/2019 7:39:22 PM PDT by bitt
Also suing for Comey’s Talking Points On Clinton Email Decision
(Washington, DC) — Judicial Watch announced today it filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the Department of Justice seeking draft copies of FBI charts containing information on potential “statutory violations” committed by Hillary Clinton in the former secretary of State’s use of a non-secure, non-government email server to conduct government business.
Judicial Watch is also suing for draft copies of talking points prepared by the FBI for its officials to use following then-Director James Comey’s July 2016 press conference during which he recommended against prosecuting Clinton for mishandling classified information.
Judicial Watch filed the lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia after the DOJ failed to respond to a December 3, 2018, FOIA request (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of Justice (No. 1:19-cv-00800)). Judicial Watch seeks:
All final and draft copies of talking points prepared by the FBI for its Executive Assistant Directors (EADs) relating to the “Mid-Year Exam” investigation (“MYE Talking Points) following the July 5, 2016 James Comey press conference in which he indicated he would not recommend prosecuting Hillary Clinton. All final draft copies of a one-page version of the aforementioned MYE Talking Points created for FBI Special Agents-in-Charge (SACs). All final and draft copies of charts of the “statutory violations considered during the investigation [of Hillary Clinton’s server], and the reasons for the recommendation not to prosecute.” Judicial Watch recently uncovered DOJ records in a related lawsuit showing that three days after then-FBI Director James Comey’s press conference announcing that he would not recommend a prosecution of Clinton. On July 8, 2016, the Special Counsel to the FBI’s executive assistant director in charge of the National Security Branch, whose name is redacted, wrote to Strzok and others that he was producing a “chart of the statutory violations considered during the investigation [of Clinton’s server], and the reasons for the recommendation not to prosecute…”
Neither these talking points nor the chart of potential violations committed by Clinton and her associates have been released.
“Judicial Watch will continue pressing for the secret FBI chart of potential Hillary Clinton crimes,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said. “The FBI should focus on this Clinton ‘matter’ now that it is unencumbered by the corrupt partisanship of Comey, McCabe, Strzok, Page, etc.”
p
Judicial Watch, doing the work our corrupt government agencies wish they weren’t doing.
So many seditionists and traitors . ..so little time .
Destroying the myth that the government is capable of competent oversight of itself.
Destroying the myth that the press provides government oversight.
Barr should issue an order requiring immediate and complete compliance the the request.
Is there a statute of limitations on Hillary’s multi decades crime spree?
Not under RICO statutes
If people like Obama, or Hillary, and their ardent obsessive and delusional followers and sycophants were just ‘criminals’, only trying to enrich themselves, they'd be much less problematic and dangerous. At some point they'd be happy to fly below the radar and fade into the scenery - as soon as they had accumulated enough wealth to satiate themselves, and were securely beyond scrutiny.
The guy/gal who steals your car and sells it to a chop shop is not an ongoing risk to you. You absorbed the loss, reported your car stolen, collected the insurance money, and then moved on with your life. The damage was done, and moving forward, the thief will almost certainly have no additional effect on your life.
Not so with people like Obama and Hillary. They NEED to have ongoing influence and control in not only your life, but in as many lives as possible. It's what defines them to themselves as far beyond ‘ordinary’. To themselves, they are very special people, and in their quest to establish this as irrefutable truth, they are willing to trash your life and your self-determinism.
Why not just ask Attorney General Bill Barr for these documents.
Exactly!
It is my understanding that there is a 5 year statute of limitations for criminal cases (under Rico laws). However, it isn’t clear if there is any statute of limitations for civil cases.
so few lamp poles, so little rope....
If I remember correctly, crimes that involve violations of the National Security Act don’t have a statute of limitation.
If trump won’t indict Hillary and Obama, let’s have a trial online. I think HBO had a trail of Kings assassin.
A Sept 2018 report noted that AG Rosenstein secretly recorded Pres Trump in the White House preparatory to invoking the 25th Amendment to have Pres Trump removed. Judicial Watch’s immediate follow-up FOIA requests were ignored. Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton: “It is no surprise that we are facing an immense cover-up of senior FBI and DOJ leadership discussions to pursue a seditious coup against Pres Trump. This effort to overthrow Pres Trump is a fundamental threat to our constitutional republic; Judicial Watch will do everything it can in the courts to expose everything possible about this lawlessness.”
============================================
Corrupt just doesn't adequately describe these Deep State bums.....more like born-criminals and con artists.
Two important products of Congressional investigations:
<><>the 18 Jan 2017 memo declassified by Pres Trump,
<><> the 28 Dec 2018 letter to Sen Mitch McConnell,
The key facts revealed:
<><> (1) the Obama FBI used, as factual basis for FISA apps, bogus info from the Steele dossier, a compilation of anti-Trump info that the FBI had not verified.
<><> (2) Obama's corrupt FBI nevertheless swore to the truth of that info to obtain surveillance warrants on Carter Page, Trump's one-time campaign advisor;
<><> (3) in the process of obtaining the search warrants the Obama FBI failed to inform FISA that the Steele dossier was bought and paid for by the DNC and Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign.
Obama hand-in-hand with his pal, NSA's Susan Rice.... outrageously asked for and obtained hundreds of “unmaskings,” of US citizens’. Their communications were intercepted by the Obama FBI and NSA as part of so-called intel operations. Innocent Americans were unmasked, and were used against Trump in the campaign.
<><> Why did the unmaskings even occur, and what information was illegally shared by Rice with Obama and/or Hillary?
<><>What illegal direction did the FBI, the NSA, and other intel agencies take to monitor Trump-related communications?
Predictably, Democraps have stopped the investigations cold. The most heinous aspect of this Democrap outrage is that the Obama admin and his factotums ----like Third World tinpot warlords----calculatedly picked over the intel apparat, set-up to protect the safety and security of Americans, to advance their scurrilous political schemes.
Partners in crime.......the two we should be investigating.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.