Support Free Republic, Folks! Donate Today!
Posted on 05/28/2019 2:27:40 PM PDT by jazusamo
Supreme Court Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Clarence Thomas had two very different opinions when it came to a ruling on Tuesday that effectively upheld an Indiana law on disposal of fetal remains.
The court’s ruling allowed Indiana to enforce a requirement that abortion clinics either bury or cremate fetal remains following an abortion. The justices said in an unsigned opinion that the case does not involve limits on abortion rights. Ginsburg was one of two liberal-leaning justices who dissented.
Ginsburg said in a short solo opinion that she believes the issue does impact a woman's right to have an abortion "without undue interference from the state."
Ginsburg’s dissent was not met well by Thomas, who said that it “makes little sense” and “lacks evidentiary support.”
“Justice Ginsburg does not even attempt to argue that the decision below was correct,” Thomas said in his opinion. “Instead, she adopts Chief Judge Wood’s [who wrote the federal appeals court ruling from the 7th Circuit] alternative suggestion that regulating the disposition of an aborted child’s body might impose an “undue burden” on the mother’s right to abort that (already aborted) child.”
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Huge understatement...If RBG leaned any further left her entire left side would be flat on the floor.
I thought she was dead? /s
Well, this should at least put the rumors of RBG’s death aside for a while....
Unless it is an impersonator.
I guess it could be an impersonator, and RBG long ago became worm food.
When Ginsburg dies, maybe her children will toss her remains in a dumpster. Obviously, in her opinion, the state has no right to interfere with them doing so...
I wonder what hell is going to look like for rabid abortion cheerleaders like Ginsberg, will they spen eternity wading knee deep in blood abs aborted body parts?
If it was a pet cat or dog being cremated or buried, many of the pro-abort types wouldn’t object to this type of law. Heaven forbid, a human “fetus” would be afforded such respect...
RBG opposes anything that gets in the way of the PP agenda.
Dear Ruth,
Please die.
Thank you,
Prav.
Ginsburg’s barbs don’t have much behind them.
These were written opinions but has anyone actually seen her recently.
“I guess it could be an impersonator,”
Ruth Buzzi
I believe you nailed it, you’re exactly right.
She wants it disposed like it's an amputated leg or other diseased tissue.
-PJ
Support Free Republic, Folks! Donate Today!
She’s only 86 years post natal, should still be within the window to abort her.
“regulating the disposition of an aborted child’s body might impose an “undue burden” on the mother’s right to abort”
What they are really worried about is that without the ability to sell dead baby parts or get federal funding, Planned Parenthood might not have a profitable business model.
There should be a law. Show your face or forfeit your seat.
—Ouch—, good one!
They can do some amazing things with animatronics nowadays...
Ruthie desperately needs to be retired.
After which, we need to put some sort of limit on the court term of office...
not sure quite what would work best? but letting someone like Ruth keep haunting the court year after year after year ....growing more and more senile or just plain crazy...
we definitely need to devise a system, method whereby judicial appointees don’t wind up embarrassing themselves (and screwing up their work duties) so much
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.