Posted on 05/29/2019 7:57:25 PM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
But Mueller probably doesn't fear indictment.
Mueller looks horrible.
I have seen where “shame” has caused one to go to an early grave. Not wishing anything like that, but after the Dershowitz remarks, along with surprise comments from some others, it is hard to see him recover his precious reputation.
Rightly so.
They almost unanimously took the word of Stormy Daniels over that of the President of the United States.
Pretty bad when you have a liberal standing up for the President and nary a word from any of those on the right.
Scumbags, the whole lot.
“Makes you wonder what they’ve got on Mueller.”
Or better yet..... What Mueller has on Mueller?
He will say or do Anything to save his skin.
I’d disagree. His one vote is just a drop of water in an ocean. His words, however, have far-reaching consequences. When I hear those G-d-damned idiots in Congress or CNN, or hear of someone getting assaulted or chased out of a restaurant on account of their political affiliation, or a speaker shut down on campus, I despair of humanity. That Dershowitz speaks his mind and speaks it well, and dares to go off the reservation, and doesn’t resort to cheap name-calling or rhetorical overkill to stifle dissent gives me hope, even though he votes wrong and often is wrong, however articulate. He at least is engaged in dialogue instead of screeching. My father, as left wing as he was, was similarly engaged, at least some of the time. We’re in the age of antifa and snowflakes. When Trump wins in 2020, it’s going to get worse. When you’re in the dessert, you take your oases where you can find them. Dershowitz lately has been good, at least relatively. He cares about the law, and he’s appalled by what’s going on in the legal community, as well he should be.
Rep. Louie Gohmert(R) has compiled a history of Mueller’s misdeeds...it is a must read!
https://gohmert.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=398634
True, but you cannot obstruct justice when there was none in the first place.
Thanks. A Republican who actually supports Trump. Hard to find such a person yesterday after Mueller’s “We didn’t say he was innocent, so you might want to impeach him.”
Also, Mueller was probably getting hammered by his team of Hillary donors (who also might have been "motivated" by powerful DS creatures).
Something is eating away at him...
I agree. Before yesterday I thought maybe his Hillary-loving SC team was writing his letters, and maybe they wrote some of his little speech yesterday, but it was definitely he reading/speaking.
It’s not the Republicans fault that Democrats never face consequences for their crimes.
It’s the people - far too many brainwashed people still listen to the fake news and trust Hollywood celebrities on late night talk shows. Until the Left’s monopoly of the press and Hollywood is broken, the Democrats get to decide what is a “scandal”, and what merits public outrage.
Spy-gate will never be reported as a scandal. There will be no outrage. Without public outrage, there can be no consequences for politicians - they simply can’t act unless there is overwhelming public pressure to do so - and there is NOT.
It would be more accurate to say both. I admit there are a few good ones in the GOP, but also many bad ones.
We can’t prove that he didn’t, to paraphrase Mueller himself.
Makes you wonder what they’ve got on Mueller?
Thanks for posting this question.
Mueller reminds us of Roberts’s actions after Roberts was sworn in.
Check my new tagline!
That was part of the definition of prosecutorial misconduct that I found and added to my post. I would say it fits the definition, in my opinion. I was wondering what others thought. 8>)
Yes it was.
Which makes conservative badge lickers so hard to understand.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.