“Hate Crime” law is perhaps the greatest threat against the Constitution. It’s bad law.
Didn’t Ayn Rand write about governments hating law abiding citizens a few decades ago?
“Of course, it may be we do not value the rule of law enough to sacrifice any other objectives to strengthen it.”
The money shot...
The sad result of multiple generations of FedGov (mis)educated sheeple. Reagan was right. America accepts socialism in the name of liberalism. The fact that the lefturds are still screeching at the moon is the only way we are being awakened to their insanity.
Look no further than Mueller’s theory of criminal conspiracy. Basically, actively defending yourself is “obstruction.”
It’s how the government controls the people. At any moment any one of us can be arrested and prosecuted for nothing, and we will go broke defending ourselves.
The government has infinite resources. We don’t, unless we are “poor.”
If they want to get you, they will. The power of government. It has the power and the resources. This is why the people we put in power absolutely MUST be incorruptible and fair. I’m sure there are prosecutors who are 100% incorruptible and fair. But with most of them, the temptation is too great to use their office for personal gain or vendetta.
Gorsuch is the only Protestant on the Court. The others are Catholics or Jews whose religious heritages are filled with oppressive hierarchies that have nothing to do with freedom in Christ and everything to do with controlling people and their wealth. Figure it out.
I’ve often said that the average person commits five crimes before breakfast, and a felony or two before lunch.
I have broken three laws just this morning....
Executive leadership and oversight cannot allow people make police become unlawful law enforcement by preventing LE from doing their jobs.
It starts with Drugs and Illegal Immigration. This pure racketeering and Trump should slam City Mayors and Gov’s into the slammer for misdirection of LE.
If leadership in a city stands down LE during race riots or other forms of civil disobedience, they should be prosecuted for two tracks of law, first for failure to execute the duties of their office to uphold the law, and secondly for putting the populace into danger, the loss of life, or damage to property with non commutable life sentences or the death penalty.
Gorsuch is likely to lead the USSC to completely overhaul its thinking about cases like this, and 20 years from now to be thought the most influential justice for the century.