Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BOBWADE

I don’t understand that since an EO only operates what is within the Ex Branch, then the SC is crossing out of bounds from its Judicial Branch to another Branch in attempting a ruling on Ex Branch internals (EOs) - therefore violating that separation of govt. powers thingy.. :(


19 posted on 06/03/2019 12:23:03 PM PDT by urtax$@work (The only kind of memorial is a Burning memorial !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: urtax$@work

I don’t understand why there is a court issue here.
DACA wasn’t legislation, it wasn’t a Zero EO, it was policy from Zero’s DHS - a policy memo. New President, new policy, new DHS director, new memo (Someone posted Trump’s memo!)
And yes I know everything Trump does will end up in federal court so whose pushing this court action us or them?


25 posted on 06/03/2019 12:33:57 PM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: urtax$@work

Agreed. The court either recognizes the EO order or it does not. Zero’s EO simply stated his administration was asserting their authority as it comes to prosecutoral discretion. President Trump’s EO simply rolled back Zero’s EO. POTUS should issue a new EO defining that the federal statute would apply to all immigrants as there will no longer be a deferral from prosecution. Simply stated, the law will be applied as written.


29 posted on 06/03/2019 1:33:33 PM PDT by BOBWADE (RINOs suck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson