Besides, the socialists have an entirely different paint scheme in mind.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
To: Libloather
2 posted on
06/14/2019 3:48:38 AM PDT by
Chickensoup
(Voter ID for 2020!! Leftists totalitarian fascists appear to be planning to eradicate conservatives)
To: Libloather
Why are we bothering with what will never happen? There wont be future presidents. Trump is the end of the line.
3 posted on
06/14/2019 3:49:18 AM PDT by
wastoute
(Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
To: Libloather
This DemoRat forgets President TRUMP already pared down the cost substantially on the new AF1. Go pound sand or better yet call Pete Buttplug for some service.
4 posted on
06/14/2019 3:49:33 AM PDT by
wetgundog
(CNN is FAKE NEWS ...Just added NBC.)
To: Libloather
This president is not going to fly on this plane under any circumstances
we're simply trying to exercise our oversight responsibilities to try to save the taxpayers money. Seriously? Since when is any DemocRAT concerned with saving taxpayers money? Since we know that being frugal with other people's money is not and has never been a DemocRAT value, we can only conclude that the Congress is once again trying to thwart the president's agenda in a really petty manner.
5 posted on
06/14/2019 3:57:44 AM PDT by
exDemMom
(Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
To: Libloather
"...we're simply trying to exercise our oversight responsibilities to try to save the taxpayers money."
Congress-critters trying to save taxpayer $$$... now, that's funny!
In all seriousness, I'd love to see these planes in bare, bright aluminum with some nice nose art. Would that that were possible.
8 posted on
06/14/2019 4:19:33 AM PDT by
LIConFem
(I will no longer accept the things I cannot change. it's time to change the things I cannot accept.)
To: Libloather
Thought they were mostly bottom feeding lawyers in Congress. Not engineers.
10 posted on
06/14/2019 4:22:32 AM PDT by
Vaquero
( Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
To: Libloather
If Obama had wanted Air Force One painted in gay rainbow colors would Congress have cared?
11 posted on
06/14/2019 4:22:50 AM PDT by
The Great RJ
("Socialists are happy until they run out of other people's money." Margaret Thatche)
To: Libloather
This guy is an idiot....the “additional paint” will not add weight to the plane. This genius doesn’t know that the old paint is completely stripped from the airframe, the surface prepared and a new coating (paint) is applied. Not additional weight.
To: Libloather
Didnt Trump already massively cut the cost of these planes?
13 posted on
06/14/2019 4:26:31 AM PDT by
Pikachu_Dad
("the media are selling you a line of soap)
To: Libloather
This from the same bunch that was stomping their little feet and demanding a pay raise?!
14 posted on
06/14/2019 4:27:02 AM PDT by
mewzilla
(Break out the mustard seeds.)
To: Libloather
Personally I think the Color of Air Force One Should relain the same.Its a color and design that have represented the United States of America and the U.S.Air Force very well since it was initiated in the 1960s.
I like what President Trump has done with many of his policies but this is one area I have to disagree with.
Leave Air Force One in its historical design.
16 posted on
06/14/2019 4:40:25 AM PDT by
puppypusher
( The world is going to the dogs.)
To: Libloather
17 posted on
06/14/2019 4:41:30 AM PDT by
mewzilla
(Break out the mustard seeds.)
To: Libloather
Rep. Joe Courtney, D-Conn., put forth an amendment that would require congressional approval for changes to the paint scheme and interior design of Air Force One. Are you freaking kidding me??!!!
Who is this @$$hat?
18 posted on
06/14/2019 4:44:52 AM PDT by
sauropod
(Yield to sin, and experience chastening and sorrow; yield to God, and experience joy and blessing.)
To: Libloather
Additional paint can add weight to the plane"The writer seems to think that either (a) the plane was never intended to be painted, or (b) Trump will demand that any new paint scheme be added on top of the old paint. How can someone that stupid find their way to a keyboard?
19 posted on
06/14/2019 4:46:00 AM PDT by
Pecos
(My rights as an individual are not subject to a public vote.)
To: Libloather
We all know that the excuse will be “more weight means burning more carbon”......
21 posted on
06/14/2019 4:57:38 AM PDT by
Erik Latranyi
(The Democratic Party is now a hate-mob)
To: Libloather
Those bastards do not need an airplane. They have to live up to their green deal.
23 posted on
06/14/2019 5:06:14 AM PDT by
dforest
(Just shut up Obama. Maybe everyone should just shut up!)
To: Libloather
A new low. Congress bitching about a plane’s paint job.
To: Libloather
change the paint scheme to a light-weight decal scheme, problem solved.
26 posted on
06/14/2019 5:19:21 AM PDT by
cranked
To: Libloather
Congress: Making the words “trite” and “trivial” have more and more meaning every day.
27 posted on
06/14/2019 5:31:28 AM PDT by
Tudorfly
(All things are possible within the will of God.)
To: Libloather
28 posted on
06/14/2019 5:32:03 AM PDT by
yldstrk
(Bingo! We have a winner!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson