WHY PELOSI DOES NOT WANT IMPEACHMENT

Unknown ^ | 6 16 2019 | UNKNOWN

[JoSixChip]

I count 61 FOR impeachment:

62, you missed gardner, that POS!

[Lurkinanloomin]

Maybe he’d afraid this will get wider notice

https://canadafreepress.com/article/dnc-failed-to-certify-obama-as-eligible-in-most-states1

[Lurkinanloomin]

Maybe she is......

[maxwellsmart_agent]

Pelosi wants impeachment but it has to be timed to do the most damage to Trump as a candidate for the 2020 election in November. That is what she is trying to do. She does not want to go too early so that the accusations made are not being forgotten. That, and only that is why she is holding off. She, and the rest of the democrats know quite well that even if they get this past the House, it will go nowhere in the Senate. The only value it will have is to slander Trump before the election.

[MinuteGal]

Ping to the points in the article. Very informative.

[fuzzylogic]

It’s the same reasons Mueller was only ever going to write a report. He was never going to indict PDJT. The second this becomes a legal matter, which impeachment is not, then all the rules change. The discovery process allows for the defense to see everything.

Ultimately, there were only two viable ways of getting rid of PDJT. First, through the process of the investigation they’ll be able to claim obstruction of justice. Which was supposed to be easy - but even that requires something of substance, not just talk. Second, the shear interference and pressure on PDJT causing him to resign. Which was never going to happen, they all completely underestimated the man.

Now they’ve backed themselves into a corner and Pelosi knows it. She knows how pushing for impeachment is only a lose-lose for D’s. Her real problem is the radical left, like AOC, aren’t reasonable and they’re causing political infighting which also hurts the party.

This is all the result of dripping hatred. They can’t contain themselves, now they’ll proceed to consume each other. What an example of human nature, it’s almost Biblical.

[luv2ski]

I think you guys that think the Senate will convict Trump are crazy. Even if a Senator doesn’t personally care for Trump, he/she will have their constituents to answer to in addition to their party. If there is a vote to convict Trump, the RNC would put tremendous pressure on the Republicans to vote against it. Having him convicted in the Senate would be incredibly damaging to the Republican party. There is NO WAY the RNC is going to let that happen.

[NTHockey]

If there are actually 61 or 62 votes, there will be tremendous pressure on the remaining Senators and these two have bad blood with President Trump. They might be persuaded.

[BatGuano]

Let’s look at the possibility that the Senate does convict President Trump. This could then create an “open season” on all who voted to convict. Lives would be lost, not only the Senators but the house members that voted to impeach.
The ensuing bloodshed would be horrific. The intent of the Founders would then be realized. The People, armed constitutionally, would rectify the wrongs of those that acted in perfidy, treachery and with treason in their hearts.

Keep your powder dry.

[Dick Bachert]

I agree. This came to me as an anonymously authored email. I set it up as a postable graphic so I could splash it around on Twitter, Gab, Mewe, etc.
PLEASE copy and past it elsewhere.

[Iscool]

I'm not so sure...Lindsay Graham says he's done with the whole Mueller deal...Burr is a never Trumper...Susan Collins and John Cornyn aren't far behind...And then there's the Turtle...

I believe the investigations would by done by committees of Burr and Graham which means possibly no one would take an active interest in defending President Trump...

[Candor7]

Obviously Nancy needs help with her leftist , caterwauling caucus.She is like a Dalek from Dr. Who: “ INCINERAAAATE!”

There’s a hole in your bucket
Dear Nancy, dear Nancy
Mend the hole then dear Donald
You silly mend it

With what shall I mend it
Dear Nancy, dear Nancy
With AOC then dear Donald
You silly with AOC

But AOC is too long
Dear Nancy, dear Nancy
Cut AOC then dear Donald
You silly cut AOC

With what shall I cut AOC
Dear nancy, dear nancy
With a knife then dear Donald
You silly with a knife

But the knife is too dull
Dear Nancy, dear Nancy
Whet the knife then dear Donald
You silly whet the knife

With what will I whet it
Dear Nancy, dear Nancy
With Barr then dear Donald
You silly with Barr

But AG Barr is too rough
Dear Nancy, dear Nancy
Smooth out Barr then dear Donald
You silly smooth AG Barr

With what shall I smooth him
Dear Nancy, dear Nancy
With Waters dear Donald
You silly with Waters

In what shall I carry her
Dear Nancy, dear Nancy
In a bucket dear Donald
You silly in a bucket

But there’s a hole in your bucket
Dear Nancy, dear Nancy
Then mend it dear Donald
You silly mend it

[Candor7]

Let’s look at the possibility that the Senate does convict President Trump. This could then create an “open season” on all who voted to convict. Lives would be lost,>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

CIVIL WAR 2 in America - WHO WOULD WIN? In-Depth Analysis

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aJh7Ye1Qvc8

[Eddie01]

Cool DB!

It rocks my mind that only a hand full of us Freepers know the real truth and stare gobsmacked at conservative icons who don’t get and can’t articulate it.

Shout it from the roof top DB!

Great to see the post!

[Dick Bachert]

Thanks. Share it!

[freebird5850]

I know libs that think if Trump is impeached Hillary becomes President.