I'm completely at sea on this. I have no idea what's going on here. So I'll just present this article without comment.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
To: Leaning Right
To: Leaning Right
Fake news.
Tenor and context distorted as per normal.
3 posted on
06/20/2019 10:32:58 PM PDT by
ifinnegan
(Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
To: Leaning Right
4 posted on
06/20/2019 10:37:09 PM PDT by
Delta 21
(Be strong & prosper, be weak & die! Stay true.... ~~ Donald J. Trump)
To: Leaning Right
As if MSN has a clue. Are they tracking late night pizza deliveries to the Pentagon?
The track record on that metric is abysmal.
5 posted on
06/20/2019 10:50:45 PM PDT by
Natty Bumppo@frontier.net
(We are the dangerous ones, who stand between all we love and a more dangerous world.)
To: Leaning Right
Approved but pulled it back, oh yeah. Absolutely #FakeNews! The president of the United States has so called emergency war powers. Long time ago USS Samuel B. Roberts while on patrol at the Straits of Hormuz stocked a Iranian mine in retaliation operation praying mantis U.S. Navy almost wiped out the Iranian navy.
To: Leaning Right
Maggie Haberman is a lying skank who should never be given credibility.
7 posted on
06/20/2019 11:10:16 PM PDT by
jospehm20
To: Leaning Right
As if MSN would know, or could be trusted to tell the truth...
8 posted on
06/20/2019 11:16:50 PM PDT by
marktwain
(President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
To: Leaning Right
“Pulls back” was apparently the catchphrase tonight. It appears in almost all the MSM coverage. I’m guessing he gave them tentative approval, because preparation was necessary, then made (at least temporarily) a decision against it. I remember a similar situation that turned out to be a feint before one of the Syria attacks.
Making it look like a backdown, while painting him as indecisive and confused is the storyline though, so there we go.
I also can’t help noting that this info started leaking shortly after Adam Schiff left the briefing this afternoon.
9 posted on
06/20/2019 11:38:34 PM PDT by
ArmstedFragg
(So Long Obie)
To: Leaning Right
I trust POTUS. If he called for and then called off a strike he had a damned good reason.
There are a lot of possibilities. One is that Iran showed him drone wreckage inside their waters.
He seemed truly surprised by this as in there are obviously back channel talks going on.
It bothers me that Nervous Nancy is against attack though.
All I can say is that “if” this report is true he had a damned good reason.
10 posted on
06/20/2019 11:41:35 PM PDT by
LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
(TRUMP TRAIN !!! Get the hell out of the way if you are not on yet because we don't stop for idiots)
To: Leaning Right
If somebody in the inner circle leaked this, they should be fired. And prosecuted.
12 posted on
06/20/2019 11:56:37 PM PDT by
Bratch
(IF YOU HAVE SELFISH IGNORANT CITIZENS, YOU ARE GOING TO HAVE SELFISH IGNORANT LEADERS-George Carlin)
To: Leaning Right
To: Leaning Right
My best guess is that Trump is keeping Iran on edge.
15 posted on
06/21/2019 12:19:52 AM PDT by
toddausauras
(How far will the left go in terms of destroying our personal freedoms?)
To: Leaning Right
according to multiple senior administration officials involved in or briefed... Oh dear Lord, can we Freepers all just go to bed now. It's late.
19 posted on
06/21/2019 1:07:10 AM PDT by
LittleBillyInfidel
(This tagline has been formatted to fit the screen. Some content has been edited.)
To: Leaning Right
And if he went ahead with it, he’d be a war monger.
The MSM would be criticizing him for military action.
No matter what he does, with the left, it’s wrong by default. It’s their knee jerk reaction to anything Trump.
21 posted on
06/21/2019 1:29:19 AM PDT by
metmom
( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
To: Leaning Right
Michael D. Shear, Eric Schmitt, Michael Crowley and Maggie Haberman should be in jail for sedition.
22 posted on
06/21/2019 1:30:42 AM PDT by
SanchoP
To: Leaning Right
No need to rush into an attack on Iran. Could have been a big mistake by some rouge or incompetent Iranian in control of the SAM battery. Those wacky Iranians have tons of rouge and incompetent people all over the place who are in constant risk of making a huge mistake, especially in places like Kharg Island
24 posted on
06/21/2019 1:54:05 AM PDT by
rdcbn
To: Leaning Right
My first thought is that this “attack plan” was discussed internally to see how quickly it was relayed to the NYT. A leak test?
26 posted on
06/21/2019 2:06:57 AM PDT by
outofsalt
(If history teaches us anything, it's that history rarely teaches anything.)
To: Leaning Right
Essentially, Trump got permission. Now they are on the negotiating table with Iran without danger of being yanked off. Chill. This isn’t a rush to war any more than Trump’s promise of “fire and fury” to North Korea.
27 posted on
06/21/2019 2:12:24 AM PDT by
HiTech RedNeck
(May Jesus Christ be praised.)
To: Leaning Right
Iranian supplied drone/strike pic. Look at the coordinates.
32 posted on
06/21/2019 2:30:10 AM PDT by
sockmonkey
(I am an America First, not Israel First FReeper.)
To: Leaning Right
If there is to be any type of action against Iran, or France, for that matter, do you really think MSNBCCNNABCCBSNBCFNCNYT will have a clue about it?
34 posted on
06/21/2019 2:34:54 AM PDT by
jazminerose
(Adorable Deplorable)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
