The mother apparently cannot care for the child. So what are the plans for it when it’s born?
I’m going to think positively here, & assume someone among those who fought the forced abortion order is stepping forward to accept responsibility for the child & likely the mother as well.
As the story notes, the mother WANTS the child, but was overruled by an activist judge who cited her disability as his reason.
The key phrase here is “forced abortion” which is a bad precedent & one more giant step down the slippery slope.
Forced abortions have been the law of the land in China for decades.
The state has NO business ordering women to have abortions.
Are you saying “my body, my choice” doesn’t apply only when the woman wants the child?
There are already millions of women exercising their “choice” to kill their babies for convenience, who fall back on your rationale as an excuse.
I can’t understand why you would so vehemently object to people stepping forward to save ONE wanted child.