Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

In major elections ruling, Supreme Court allows partisan map drawing {Guess who's objecting}
reuters.com ^ | JUNE 27, 2019 | Andrew Chung, Lawrence Hurley

Posted on 06/27/2019 9:53:05 AM PDT by drpix

In a major blow to election reformers, the U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday rejected efforts to rein in electoral map manipulation by politicians aimed at entrenching one party in power, a contentious practice known as partisan gerrymandering that critics have said warps democracy.

In a 5-4 ruling that could reverberate through U.S. politics for years to come, the justices ruled that federal judges do not have the have the ability to curb partisan gerrymandering.

~ ~ ~ clip ~ ~ ~ {Guess who's objecting}

"House of Representatives Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler, a Democrat, said in a statement, “Partisan gerrymandering is fundamentally corrosive to democracy."

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: New York
KEYWORDS: andrewchung; dnctalkingpoint; dnctalkingpoints; gerymandering; hypocrite; jerroldnadler; jerrynadler; judiciary; lawrencehurley; mediawingofthednc; nadler; newyork; partisanmediashills; presstitutes; scotus; smearmachine
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last
Nadler's district has been called "one of the ten most gerrymandered Congressional Districts in the country" and during his decades in Congress he's only won in districts gerrymandered to fit a snake like him (see his last 2 below).

10th district (2013–present)

8th district (2003-2013)

1 posted on 06/27/2019 9:53:05 AM PDT by drpix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: drpix

To define “gerrymandering,” you will have to define “NONgerrymandering.”


2 posted on 06/27/2019 9:57:54 AM PDT by fwdude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drpix

Fits like a snake is an apt description indeed.


3 posted on 06/27/2019 9:57:54 AM PDT by rlmorel (Trump to China: This Capitalist Will Not Sell You the Rope with Which You Will Hang Us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drpix

Did they remember to include “for Democrats” in the opinion?


4 posted on 06/27/2019 9:59:01 AM PDT by fwdude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drpix
Supreme Court allows partisan map drawing

That's mighty "supreme" of them.

Supreme Court allows Politicians to be political!

-PJ

5 posted on 06/27/2019 10:00:40 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (The 1st Amendment gives the People the right to a free press, not CNN the right to the 1st question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drpix

I’d really like all districts to be shaped as quadrilaterals. Move a line a little East or West. More a line a little North or South. Always be a quadrilateral. Choose a size which captures roughly the number of voters needed by the district.

No gerrymandering, No funny business.


6 posted on 06/27/2019 10:02:44 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (If White Privilege is real, why did Elizabeth Warren lie about being an Indian?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drpix

There are two solutions to redistricting:

1. Adopt the following rules:
a. Do not allow district lines to cross a body of water including oceans, lakes, rivers, streams, and big puddles.
b. Do not allow district lines to cross busy streets.
c. Do not offend Transgenders or anyone else suffering from perpetual grievances.
d. Do not allow any district lines that are not approved by the ACLU, Antifa, George Soros, and MSNBC.

2. Let the State Legislatures do it, as directed by the Constitution.


7 posted on 06/27/2019 10:04:52 AM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drpix

Maybe we should call it “GerryNadlering”...............


8 posted on 06/27/2019 10:05:15 AM PDT by Red Badger (We are headed for a Civil War. It won't be nice like the last one....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

We have a district LINE IN DESTIN that cuts thru an apartment building..............


9 posted on 06/27/2019 10:06:44 AM PDT by Red Badger (We are headed for a Civil War. It won't be nice like the last one....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel
The term came from a blend of the name of a politician who specialized in the practice and the animal those districts resembled: a salamander.

Nadler's modern version took that even a step further going from salamander to snake.

10 posted on 06/27/2019 10:09:00 AM PDT by drpix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: drpix

“In a major blow to election reformers”

No bias there, right?!


11 posted on 06/27/2019 10:11:54 AM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drpix

“Partisan gerrymandering is fundamentally corrosive to democracy.” Good work — It’s not every day Nadler is caught telling the truth.


12 posted on 06/27/2019 10:14:29 AM PDT by Chewbarkah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drpix
FTA: "House of Representatives Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler, a Democrat, said in a statement, “Partisan gerrymandering is fundamentally corrosive to democracy."

Ironic that this was not a problem until the repubs started winning state houses and controlled the redistricting process. As soon as that happened, here comes the lawsuits.

13 posted on 06/27/2019 10:14:52 AM PDT by FtrPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

The constitution in clear in this. The politicians decide. Don’t like it change the constitution.

But they also need to allow both sides to gerrymander. Right now only the left gets away with it.


14 posted on 06/27/2019 10:14:57 AM PDT by for-q-clinton (This article needs a fact checked)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: FtrPilot

And only Democrat judges would rule against gerymandering and they would only do that in lawsuits against Republicans.

Under liberal/leftwing two-tier justice the Nadlers would alway be protected.


15 posted on 06/27/2019 10:22:22 AM PDT by drpix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

Take a look at what Pervocrats* are doing locally with Chicago ward maps. Example former 23rd word past and present half of which is given to the 14th (Edmund Burke charged with shakedowns) *alleged democratic practitioners pushing perversity .
Sorry would like to show the difference but Limited technically can’t do research


16 posted on 06/27/2019 10:25:14 AM PDT by mosesdapoet (mosesdapoet aka L,J,Keslin posting for the record hoping some might read and pass around)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: drpix

Unfortunately, you are correct...When will the stupid party wake up?


17 posted on 06/27/2019 10:27:45 AM PDT by FtrPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton

All I know is Democrats were fine with gerrymandering when it benefited them. Fight fire with fire, I say.


18 posted on 06/27/2019 10:39:41 AM PDT by DarrellZero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

You can gerrymander a rectangle just as much as you can gerrymander an amorphous serpentine shape. The difference being people who think only serpentine shapes represent gerrymandered districts will be appeased by rectangular shapes.

Probably the most fair district assignments would be allocating district lines at random and having the voters give an up or down line item to keep the lines for the next elections or roll the dice again.


19 posted on 06/27/2019 10:40:09 AM PDT by jz638
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
Iowa has a great non-partisan district commission. They don't look at demographics. They don't look where politicians live. They count noses, and square it up, whether US Congress or the state house. Here is the map for Congress. Note no district crosses a county line.


20 posted on 06/27/2019 10:41:33 AM PDT by Pappy Smear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson