Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: yesthatjallen

“A group of Seattle-area baristas who argued in court that they should not be restricted from serving drinks in bikinis and other revealing clothing may have to cover up.

I agree. Forcing them to wear more clothes would be an abrogation of free speech and expression.


5 posted on 07/06/2019 8:02:26 AM PDT by be-baw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: be-baw
Anybody else think this thread is worthless without pics?

How can we do our research?


7 posted on 07/06/2019 8:06:15 AM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: be-baw

Sounds like Starbucks going after competition.

We have a food joint around here where the waitress wear bikinis and chaps. I am sure some prudes around here would love to get rid of the place. Hope not, they have good food.


20 posted on 07/06/2019 8:13:28 AM PDT by Dawggie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: be-baw

“Forcing them to wear more clothes would be an abrogation of free speech and expression.”

This has nothing to do with free speech and there is a limited definition of expression stretched here. What does it express other than an opportunity to challenge the intent of an article written for the Constitution? They didn’t have bikini baristas in 1791.

The problem with the stands are they have become a zone of crimes related to assembly and prostitution. The original problem was health and sanitary issues. Now it’s prostitution and assembly issues in some cases by the baristas themselves according to the thread. Drug sales and a threat to assault, are now the issue.

rwood


70 posted on 07/06/2019 9:33:23 AM PDT by Redwood71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson