Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

PHOTO: The 2000 US Census Asked Citizenship Question — Obama Deleted it in 2010 — Trump Wants It...
The Gateway Pundit ^ | 06 July 2019 | Jim Hoft

Posted on 07/06/2019 3:38:09 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

FULL TITLE: PHOTO: The 2000 US Census Asked Citizenship Question — Obama Deleted it in 2010 — Trump Wants It Back in 2020

On June 27th the United States Supreme Court ruled on the census citizenship question. SCOTUS sent it back to a lower court.

The decision essentially blocked the citizen question from the 2020 census.

Back in April the U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments on whether the Trump administration can include a citizenship question on the high-stakes 2020 Census questionnaire. This was a regularly asked question in historical census forms from 1820-1950.

As Michelle Malkin reported at the time, open borders groups linked to George Soros are leading the movement to exclude the citizenship question from the US Census.


(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: belongsinbloggers; census; citizenship; obama; scotus; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 07/06/2019 3:38:09 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

That is, of course, the only reason why the left-wing monolith wants it out—because their false messiah Barack deleted it, and anyone who undoes his “legacy” is automatically evil in their eyes.


2 posted on 07/06/2019 3:46:11 PM PDT by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

This is criminal. It the question was on before in 2000 and many years before that and barky took it off without any contest why is it a problem at all to put it back on?

Just put it on the census. What are they going to do put somebody in jail for illegal questions? Prove it is illegal to do it.

This is downright criminal.


3 posted on 07/06/2019 3:50:12 PM PDT by Sequoyah101 (We are governed by the consent of the governed and we are fools for allowing it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Gee. I wonder why B.O. eliminated the citizenship question?


4 posted on 07/06/2019 3:55:50 PM PDT by HighSierra5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
IIRC, That was on the long form only.

Just a simple citizen/alien...check one....is sufficient. The most common example on previous censuses.

5 posted on 07/06/2019 4:06:04 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Bam dropped it, not a word in the media and no complaints. Trump wants it back and it’s never ending protest.


6 posted on 07/06/2019 4:06:22 PM PDT by I want the USA back (The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those who speak it. Orwell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

In 1960 President Eisenhower removed the citizenship question from the census.

What was his reason for excluding it?

Did the Supreme Court make a ruling asking Ike for the reason to remove the census question?

We know the Supreme Court did not complain when the census question was removed by Ike after being in place for many, many decades.

So why is the ‘reason’ for including the census question so almighty important now?

If there was no problem to remove the census question, then there should be no problem to include it.


7 posted on 07/06/2019 4:08:59 PM PDT by Presbyterian Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
That is, of course, the only reason why the left-wing monolith wants it out—because their false messiah Barack deleted it, and anyone who undoes his “legacy” is automatically evil in their eyes.

Nope, you are way off. They want all illegals to stand up and be counted (not "hide in the shadows") so they can add more Congressional seats in the ultra-liberal states. Presidential electors are apportioned according to Congressional seats. THAT is why the leftists want it -- to boost their electoral count and win POTUS.

8 posted on 07/06/2019 4:10:28 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: HighSierra5

to save ink.


9 posted on 07/06/2019 4:12:47 PM PDT by 1_Rain_Drop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
No photo needed. Here is a link to the entire 2000 long form census. Trump should proceed with printing ONLY this as an exact repeat. Everybody gets THIS census. Nothing to “add” and no court has ruled this previous census to be unconstitutional.
10 posted on 07/06/2019 4:14:14 PM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (When your business model depends on slave labor, you're always going to need more slaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sgt_Schultze

Question 13


11 posted on 07/06/2019 4:16:26 PM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (When your business model depends on slave labor, you're always going to need more slaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

It says quite a lot that SCOTUS gave President Trump a bit of a straight arm and said “Try again”. This really ought to be a no-brainer.


12 posted on 07/06/2019 4:17:27 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (If White Privilege is real, why did Elizabeth Warren lie about being an Indian?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Obama. The “gift” that keeps on giving.


13 posted on 07/06/2019 4:25:30 PM PDT by llevrok (Vote, while it is still legal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sgt_Schultze
No photo needed. Here is a link to the entire 2000 long form census. Trump should proceed with printing ONLY this as an exact repeat.

That wouldn't help.

When the long form was in use it only went to 1 out of every 6 households. It was just a sample.

Since 2000 the ACS (American Community Survey) has been used to gather the same information, including citizenship status. It's probably at least as accurate as the long form and it's done every year.

We haven't asked every household about citizenship since 1950.

14 posted on 07/06/2019 4:25:43 PM PDT by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
True, but from what I understand it was a small percentage of census forms that actually had the question.

I actually found what I am referring to

15 posted on 07/06/2019 4:34:50 PM PDT by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The Supreme Court is nothing but a joke. The Executive Branch has the right to ask the question by law and the Court has no business violating the law. Proves what America’s Courts have become, liberal machines and will not support the Constitution.


16 posted on 07/06/2019 4:56:50 PM PDT by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

If it was part of the census so recently, then how can SCOTUS demand some special reasons just to put it back.


17 posted on 07/06/2019 5:01:51 PM PDT by Innovative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

It’s actually both. He led the way towards that lawless goal, in an official capacity; thus it becomes “legitimate”.


18 posted on 07/06/2019 5:05:57 PM PDT by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Piss on them! Just do it. If they report it was illegal, then for the SCOUTUS to poll all 375 million. Sick of these assholes that take an oath violate it because they don’t like who is in charge. Roberts is a full blown traitor.Fire him! Why should the President have to follow laws when they don’t?


19 posted on 07/06/2019 5:10:39 PM PDT by Bommer (Help 2ndDivisionVet - https://www.gofundme.com/mvc.php?route=category&term=married-recent-ampute)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sgt_Schultze

aaannnd..... we have a winner!!

Good idea. You should email the WH. Seriously.


20 posted on 07/06/2019 5:22:19 PM PDT by PhiloBedo (You gotta roll with the punches, and get with what's real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson