Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Michael Flynn’s New Brief Shines Sunlight On Prosecutor’s Tactics
saraacarter.com ^ | 7/9/2019 | Sara A. Carter

Posted on 07/09/2019 12:12:21 PM PDT by bitt

The defense team for former National Security Advisor Michael T. Flynn has submitted a filing to the Eastern District of Virginia fighting the government’s most recent proposal to ask the Court to deem Flynn a “co-conspirator” in the case against his former partner. The designation is solely for the purpose of obtaining the admission of one document the government itself claims is already admissible under a different rule, according to a brief filed by Flynn’s defense team.

The substantial briefing was filed in just the last few days in the case the government filed against Bijan Rafiekian, Flynn’s former consulting firm partner. It was only unsealed Tuesday. Flynn’s own filing is the most recent—after just receiving the government’s filing at 9 pm last night.

The evidence collected by Flynn’s current defense Attorney Sidney Powell, who recently replaced Flynn’s former defense attorney Robert Kelner, sheds new light on the extraordinary tactics used to target and retaliate against Flynn, according to the filing.

Further, Powell’s submission to the court also reveals that Flynn and his attorneys were under extreme pressure to file a Foreign Agents Registration Act in February, 2017 by David Laufman, the former head of the National Security Division.

(Excerpt) Read more at saraacarter.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: doj; fbi; flynn; michaelflynn

1 posted on 07/09/2019 12:12:21 PM PDT by bitt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; 2ndDivisionVet; azishot; ...

p


2 posted on 07/09/2019 12:12:39 PM PDT by bitt (US intel is there to protect the safety and security of Americans. It is not a political tool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Heard on the news today during Rush that they’re going after Flynn and Kuchner for something in this idiotic Mueller investigation. Maybe this is why they announced they’re going afyervhim.


3 posted on 07/09/2019 12:15:45 PM PDT by FrdmLvr (They never thought she would lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FrdmLvr
afyervhim is that like covfefe?
4 posted on 07/09/2019 12:20:36 PM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie (All I know is The I read in the papers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie
afyervhim is that like covfefe?>

aperitif and coffee


5 posted on 07/09/2019 12:31:42 PM PDT by spokeshave (If anything, Trump is guilty of attempting to obstruct injustice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: spokeshave

My dog just barfed that up.


6 posted on 07/09/2019 12:35:46 PM PDT by ryderann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bitt
Epstein, a sex trafficker for decades, is A-OK with The Deep State, but go after Flynn, no problem. Deep State DC disgusts me!
7 posted on 07/09/2019 12:37:09 PM PDT by Chgogal (Definition of a “louse”: Robert Mueller. Definition of a “Jacka$$”: SCJ Roberts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spokeshave
My friend and I will be right over for dinner


8 posted on 07/09/2019 12:55:22 PM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie (All I know is The I read in the papers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Sydney Powell has the feds dead to rights


9 posted on 07/09/2019 1:13:36 PM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
One of the reasons why the Flynn legal situation is so interesting is not really because of Flynn himself; but rather because the Flynn situation is a likely example of President Obama’s surveillance network in operation.

QUOTING TOM FITTON, JUDICIAL WATCH PRESIDENT:
Obama's State Dept was all hands on deck in terms of targeting Trump (as the candidate then as president).

<><> meetings with Glen Simpson, Steele, Clinton aides, Sid Blumenthal and Clinton associate, Cody Shearer.
<><> There was more than one dossier going to the FBI and DOJ.....
<><> there was Christopher Steele's dossier,
<><> and a second dossier created by the State Dept itself, targeting Trump.
<><> shows Jonathan Winer and Glen Simpson were in contact Sept 2016
<><> Winer immediately contacted Victoria Nuland, a top aide at the Obama State Dept.
<><> Post-election, they worked hand in glove with top Dem Steny Hoyer's guy on Russian issues.
<><> (which means if Steny knew, Pelosi knew and if Pelosi knew, Schmanure knew),
<><> They conveyed info gained from Steele, a close to associate of Jonathan Winer.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com .......

10 posted on 07/09/2019 1:18:06 PM PDT by Liz ( Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: All

Powell needs to get on this.

The execrable Susan Rice's email sent to herself on Trump's inauguration day---just hours before she was scheduled to leave purported to document part of the strange meeting Obama held.

As Obama's top security aide, Rice was nervous about the fact that, at the president’s direction, she had failed
“to share information fully as it relates to Russia” with President Trump’s incoming national security team........

NOTE: Rice was being replaced by Gen Flynn.

Her actions violated longstanding American tradition. Outgoing administrations have always cooperated in the transition to a new administration, whether of the same or the opposing party, especially on matters relating to national security.

Susan Rice is far from the brightest bulb on the tree, but she was well aware that by concealing facts ostensibly relating to national security from her counterpart in the new administration–General Michael Flynn–she was, at a minimum, violating longstanding civic norms.

If she actually lied to Flynn, she could have been accused of much worse. So Rice wanted to be able to retrieve her email, if she found herself in a sticky situation, and tell the world that she hid relevant facts about Russia from the new administration on Barack Obama’s orders.

What were the secrets that Obama wanted to keep from the new Trump administration?
We can easily surmise that
<><>the Steele memo was paid for by the Democratic Party;
<><>that the FBI had to some degree collaborated with Steele;
<><>that the Clinton campaign had fed some of the fake news in the dossier to Steele;
<><>that Comey’s FBI had used Steele’s fabrications as the basis for FISA warrants to spy on the Trump campaign.

These were among the facts that Obama and his minions didn’t want Michael Flynn and Donald Trump to know. Susan Rice, we can infer, was told to keep these secrets, and if anyone ever asked why she had failed to disclose them to Michael Flynn and others on Trump’s team, or even lied to those people, she would have the defense that President Obama ordered her to do it.

There may be more to it than this. The redacted paragraph likely contains more information about what it was that Rice wasn’t supposed to tell the Trump team. One of these days, we will learn what was blacked out.

The fact that Michael Flynn was Susan Rice’s counterpart in the incoming administration may also be significant. We know that the FBI agents who interviewed General Flynn–even Peter Strzok!–reported that they didn’t think he had lied about anything.

And yet, Obama’s DOJ and Bob Mueller’s “investigation”–basically a continuation of Obama’s corrupt Department of Justice under another, less accountable name–persecuted Flynn to the point where he finally pled guilty to a single count of lying to the FBI in order, as he says, to end the madness and the financial drain.

Why were the Democrats so determined to discredit General Flynn? Perhaps because they wanted to pre-empt any outrage that may otherwise have followed on revelations that the Obama administration’s National Security Advisor hid important facts from Gen Flynn, her successor, during the transition, and may have lied to him about those facts, in violation of all American tradition.

11 posted on 07/09/2019 1:19:56 PM PDT by Liz ( Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie
Oh geez. Sloppy. 🤦🏼‍♀️ Should have looked before posting.
12 posted on 07/09/2019 2:47:39 PM PDT by FrdmLvr (They never thought she would lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Liz

If you had been following Sydney Powell’s appearances on FNC, you’s know she been all over this for at least a year.

She’s seen enough bullshit and dishonesty from prosecutors and judges, she’s not going to tolerate it anymore.


13 posted on 07/09/2019 5:29:52 PM PDT by WASCWatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson