Skip to comments.
Over 1,000 Google employees sign petition to use market dominance to starve Breitbart of ad revenue
American Thinker ^
| 07/10/2019
| Thomas Lifson
Posted on 07/11/2019 7:27:51 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 last
To: SkyDancer
What is Breitbart? Oh yeah, the guys who banned me from commenting on their site, and would not tell me why.
41
posted on
07/11/2019 10:36:51 AM PDT
by
JimRed
( TERM LIMITS, NOW! Build the Wall Faster! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
To: JimRed
I think it would be DISQUS since that's what they use for comments; they have their own moderators as well as DISQUS.
Banning would be like:
We welcome thoughtful responses and inputs. Comments with personally identifiable information, harassment, threats, or other violations will be removed.
Please let us know if you're having issues with commenting.
https://www.breitbart.com/contact-us/comment-feedback/
What did you post to have you being banned?
42
posted on
07/11/2019 12:01:49 PM PDT
by
SkyDancer
( ~ Just Consider Me A Random Fact Generator ~ Eat Sleep Fly Repeat ~)
To: JimRed
PS: I’ve read some pretty nasty comments directly aimed at specific individuals and they were posted.
43
posted on
07/11/2019 12:02:38 PM PDT
by
SkyDancer
( ~ Just Consider Me A Random Fact Generator ~ Eat Sleep Fly Repeat ~)
To: SeekAndFind
Wow that sure sounds like being on the edge of an anti-trust law to me.
I wonder if the RICO laws can be used against such organized criminal organizations such as Google?
To: Petrosius
Agree, they are public utilities in so far as people now depend on them for a functional life in this world of global interconnectivity. That said I am all for government imposing rules defining what they can and cannot do. If it isn’t a censored site at all I’d be more likely to contribute a monthly fee to sustain it, much like our utilities.
I feel it’s the governments job to ensure our 1a rights are not trampled upon. Currently they are and will continue with impunity until something is done to prevent this. I think we are going down a rabbit hole which will prove difficult/dangerous to get out of.
45
posted on
07/11/2019 12:31:55 PM PDT
by
TermLimits4All
(Immigration? Yep I support it, LEGAL IMMIGRATION DONE THE RIGHT WAY! Walls save lives.)
To: SkyDancer
What did you post to have you being banned? That's the problem- I don't know. When I used contact-us on their site and asked (several times over a couple of weeks) they didn't give me the courtesy of a reply.
As far as DISQUS is concerned, I've used it on other sites since then without any problems.
46
posted on
07/11/2019 1:03:33 PM PDT
by
JimRed
( TERM LIMITS, NOW! Build the Wall Faster! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
To: DiogenesLamp
Once again, let us worry about massive communications corporations's "property rights" to a publicly used communications infrastructure instead of worrying about how this control of communications will be used to destroy millions of lives if they are allowed to keep doing it.So 1% of Alphabet's employees signed a letter.
What was management's response?
47
posted on
07/11/2019 1:09:09 PM PDT
by
semimojo
To: JimRed
Well I’ve been banned from MyNorthwest.com for some stupid reason; they’ve never said why.
48
posted on
07/11/2019 1:27:04 PM PDT
by
SkyDancer
( ~ Just Consider Me A Random Fact Generator ~ Eat Sleep Fly Repeat ~)
To: SeekAndFind
49
posted on
07/11/2019 1:52:21 PM PDT
by
Sergio
(An object at rest cannot be stopped! - The Evil Midnight Bomber What Bombs at Midnight)
To: SeekAndFind
My FRiend, it is not so much readers (unless they are searching) but advertisers who have been stopped from going to, or paying, WND. This is one way Google has strangled people who think differently.
50
posted on
07/11/2019 2:08:50 PM PDT
by
golux
To: semimojo
So 1% of Alphabet's employees signed a letter. What percentage of employees decides what a corporation will do? 50%? Or is it closer to 1%, or even just 1?
51
posted on
07/11/2019 4:46:54 PM PDT
by
DiogenesLamp
("of parents owing allegiance to no oither sovereignty.")
To: DiogenesLamp
What percentage of employees decides what a corporation will do? 50%? Or is it closer to 1%, or even just 1?It's the executive management which is way less than 1%
It damn sure isn't the Filipino feminist Googlers shown on the Project Veritas smoking email.
52
posted on
07/11/2019 7:07:15 PM PDT
by
semimojo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson