Posted on 07/11/2019 9:00:38 AM PDT by OfficialJudicialWatch
In addition, the Washington watchdog Judicial Watch asked the Department of Homeland Security in 2015 for records of Clinton’s Secret Service expenses while he traveled with Epstein on the hedge fund manager’s private jet, dubbed the “Lolita Express.” But the department never handed over the records, reported OAN, the One America News network.
According to flight logs, Clinton traveled 26 times on Epstein’s Boeing 727 from 2001 to 2003, Fox News reported in 2016. Epstein allegedly offered sex to underage girls aboard the jet. An air hostess testified the “Lolita Express” had a bed where passengers had group sex.
In 2008, Epstein was prosecuted for soliciting sex with underage girls. But in a plea deal, he served only a 13-month sentence in a county jail in which he was allowed to go to his office during the day to work.
Read more at https://www.wnd.com/2019/07/clinton-library-refuses-to-hand-over-info-on-bills-ties-to-epstein/#53MzFqBTgHYSp6X3.99
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Judicial Watch’s library card expired. They refused to return The Joy of Sex on time and were too embarrassed to bring the book to the main circulation desk. Thus, no borrowing privileges.
The ironic thing is, in ten years all this underage predation will be a central leg of the Democrat platform.
liberals refuse to hand over info? Gosh what a surprise
How about Federal Marshals and a search warrant,
A lot of people are missing some of the most important parts of the story:
1. Katie Couric and George Stephanouplous attended a Yom Kippur buffet in honor of Epstein at his NYC home just months after he was released from his 13-month Florida “punishment”, as supervised by the guards Epstein himself HIRED.
One hundred other friends attended that meal, and amazingly, many brought their kids.
2. The newest deal his lawyers proposed the other day, read EACH word slowly, now..!
“He will name some of the people who paid for sex in exchange for not more than 5 years”.
Parse EACH word, did it get by you, it’s just ONE word that is operative here:
PAID. Paid for sex. Not “later paid incredibly much in return for silence”. No, paid for SEX.
How likely is it that many of them paid..? Not many.
Why would he omit from his deal those who did NOT pay? Because those are the most important people and because those are nearly ALL of the people.
And most importantly:
Because omitting the NON payers from being named in Epstein’s deal preserves what is most valuable to those who are behind all this and those actually rule America —the precious blackmail material Epstein went to such pains to collect, the material that will bind together the powerful people who otherwise would hate each other’s guts and not work together.
The Big Wheels, the movers and shakers, are left aside so that in the future they can still be leveraged and relied upon. So that they can be called on for their precious, timely, high-level help in future intel ops; moving money around, opening accounts, vouching for the shadowy figures who must be used to do important, little-known things.
To wage wars.
To skew election results.
That’s actually a great point.
There’s a legal difference between a “paid” transaction in currency and all the other reasons for doing ‘business’ like this with powerful and well connected people where the transactions are in favors, promises, and connections.
I guess the Ultimate Power Couple, Slick and Herself, really believe in the provisions of the Fifth Amendment, that they have the right to remain silent on this subject, and not bear witness against themselves.
Certainly nothing much exonerates either of them at this point.
"Some"? Perhaps he is looking for immunity from any he may overlook. Otherwise, unless all of "some" are dead and he seeks to protect their families, such a limitation would seem a real non-starter. Worse, it may only include those already known to the prosecuting team: i.e., a complete dodge.
Analyze his financials and tax returns to identify any quid pro quo from "Lolita guests" that later had dealings.
The prosecution's negotiating position will be greatly enhanced when it holds a couple of life sentences.
This will be entertaining.
And... Pizza Gate is still something that makes you wonder.
Where’s Sandy Pants when you need him.
Oh, never mind. He was a pal of Epstein’s.
Can we also see the medical records and the number of tests Slick Willy took for Aids and VD?
How many women from Epstein’s Island were tested for STD’s after Slick Willy paid a visit?
I’m fed up with departments and agencies hiding stuff and refusing to cooperate with law. AG Barr should demand DHS release this information. If that doesn’t work, Trump should start firing people at DHS.
Bingo. And you’ll be a religious bigot and bad person if you disapprove. Brave New Sick World.
if there are pictures AND if the good guys have them, we will entet a new national era.
Why would the Clinton Library have any info about Epstein??
This OP’s headline is very poorly written to suggest Judicial Watch requested from, & was refused such info, by the Clinton Library.
In fact, the article says Jack Posobiec— who AFAIK is not affiliated with Judicial Watch— made that request on Twitter. A tweet is not a formal request.
Then the article goes on to say “In addition..” (to Posobiec’s tweet) Judicial Watch has requested info from Homeland Security (not the Clinton Library!) re: Clinton’s Secret Service expenses while on Lolita Express.
The rest of the article goes on about SS expenses WRT number of times on Lolita Express as shown on flight manifests.
FWIW, I’ve seen the manifests published elsewhere (Daily Mail?) and noted wide fluctuations in number of Secret Service agents accompanying Clinton.
Anywhere from zero to 12 agents.
Why? Shouldn’t he have about the same number always?
To me, this raises questions about Secret Service.
Were certain agents invited by Clinton to partake in Epstein’s orgies, thus compromising the SS?
In any event, what did agents see?
Knowing the Clintons, that makes sense. Those sneaks will do everything to hide their indiscretions. They are the most untrustworthy people tied to the Washington people ever. They are dirtballs, no question.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.