Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tucker Carlson Has A Point About The Dangers Of Immigration: We Don't Teach American Values
The Federalist ^ | 07/12/2019 | John Daniel Davidson

Posted on 07/12/2019 11:15:40 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

Tucker Carlson’s monologue Tuesday night going after Rep. Ilhan Omar for her anti-American statements provoked predictable accusations of racism, in particular against his contention that Omar is “living proof that the way we practice immigration has become dangerous to this country.”

But as my colleague David Harsanyi noted, Carlson wasn’t criticizing Omar because of her race or religious background, but because of her radical ideas, “because she doesn’t believe in the traditional ideas that define American life.”

Harsanyi disagrees with Carlson about immigration as a whole, though. He says, contra Carlson, that liberal immigration policies are good, and add much to American society. In general, this is correct. Or at least it has been the case throughout most of our history.

Where Carlson has a point, however, is in his assertion that, “No country can import large numbers of people who hate it, and expect to survive.” That’s true of both immigrants and the native born, and indeed Carlson has also noted recently that no country can be governed by people who hate it—like the crowded field of Democratic candidates scrambling to denounce America—and expect to survive.

The question, then, is whether we’re doing enough to ensure that both immigrants and the native-born don’t end up hating America the way Omar, who has every reason not to hate America, obviously does. We arguably ask too little of our immigrants and don’t do a good job of assimilating them—and by assimilating, I mean instilling in them traditional American values.

But the reason we don’t do a very good job of that anymore is because we don’t do a very good job of creating Americans from the native-born population in general.

The immigration question, in this context, is a little like the question of adding more states. Why, under a post-constitutional progressive regime in which state governments are in thrall to federal policy, would any conservative want to add more states to the union? Under the circumstances, adding more states would make our structural problems with so-called “cooperative federalism” worse, since there’s zero chance that any new state would resist federal money and the strings attached to it.

In the same vein, why would we want to take in large numbers of immigrants just to have their children attend public schools and universities that indoctrinate them with progressive ideology and teach them to hate America? Indeed, the infiltration of our institutions by progressives is pervasive. You can’t even go to the local public library these days without having transgenderism and other progressive values forced on you.

Beyond institutions, we’re now faced with the horrible phenomenon of woke capitalism, in which massive corporations aggressively push identity politics on their customers, whether they ask for it or not, and what used to be unifying symbols, like a Revolutionary War flag, are instead taken as icons of slavery and racism.

It’s hard to create patriotic Americans in such an environment, and harder still to persuade newcomers to be patriotic Americans. While it’s true that the United States is far better at assimilating immigrants than, say, France and Germany, we are steadily becoming more like those countries in this respect.

Some, like The Atlantic’s Conor Friedersdorf, think it’s “absurd” to say that Omar proves anything, for better or worse, about America’s immigration system. “Isn’t getting elected to Congress a great achievement, and proof of assimilation?” he asks.

Well, no, not really. Omar and others on the far-left want to eradicate the American constitutional system, which they believe is a source of oppression and injustice. That they want to do so by gaining control of the levers of power is, if anything, proof that they’re serious—that they really mean what they say.

But we might improve on Carlson’s assertion that Omar is living proof that the way we practice immigration is dangerous by taking one step back. Somewhere along the line, despite everything America gave to Omar and her family, she was taught to despise this country.

That should give us pause, because it means the problem goes far beyond immigration. It includes all of us, and nearly every institution of public life. Omar, in this view, is living proof that the way we educate our children, and the way we live now as a nation, is very dangerous indeed.



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: immigration; tuckercarlson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 07/12/2019 11:15:40 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Of course we do not teach AMERICAN VALUES. Look at who and what controls academia.


2 posted on 07/12/2019 11:23:39 AM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“traditional American values”

That should read “essential American values”. Not like Scots wearing kilts or Greeks say “opa”. Lacking these values, we’d still be some degenerate backwater of England and Spain. Losing them, we might as well pack it in. Done.


3 posted on 07/12/2019 11:24:14 AM PDT by rightwingcrazy (;-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Well according to our betters, anything that could be labeled as “American” values or culture is inherently racist.
4 posted on 07/12/2019 11:24:15 AM PDT by yuleeyahoo (The nation which can prefer disgrace to danger is prepared for a master and deserves one. Hamilton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yuleeyahoo

RE: anything that could be labeled as “American” values or culture is inherently racist.

OK, what values do they want then?


5 posted on 07/12/2019 11:25:50 AM PDT by SeekAndFind (look at Michigan, it will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

It’s an excellent point.

When we had the massive waves of immigration coming in the early 20th Century we had settlement houses and other programs intended to help ASSIMILATE those immigrants.

Today ASSIMILATE is a dirty word. Racist-sexist-bigoted-homophobe and the rest of it.


6 posted on 07/12/2019 11:26:47 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog (Patrick Henry would have been an anti-vaxxer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightwingcrazy

The 1965 immigration act that Ted Kennedy assured us would not flood the country with foreigners and would not change the demographics has done both.
It was a slow acting cyanide capsule.


7 posted on 07/12/2019 11:27:20 AM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here Of Citizen Parents_Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rightwingcrazy
That should read “essential American values”.

I will give you a good example. I know some highly educated immigrants. Naturalized US Citizens with advanced degrees. Their ignorance of our Constitution is shocking. To the point where you wonder just how in the hell they are managing to get through this supposed test that you need to take to gain citizenship.

Not only do they not know the Constitution, but they actually seem to oppose it. They have no foundation on the reasons WHY things like the electoral college and separation of powers are in there.


8 posted on 07/12/2019 11:29:29 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog (Patrick Henry would have been an anti-vaxxer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin

What, you mean a Kennedy lied?
Stop the presses!


9 posted on 07/12/2019 11:30:02 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog (Patrick Henry would have been an anti-vaxxer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

RE: When we had the massive waves of immigration coming in the early 20th Century we had settlement houses and other programs intended to help ASSIMILATE those immigrants.

Yes, and we turned on and off, the immigration numbers as needed.

Turning it off for some years to allow the current immigrants to assimilate, and then turning it back on to news migrants, once the existing ones were assimilated.


10 posted on 07/12/2019 11:30:03 AM PDT by SeekAndFind (look at Michigan, it will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

We don’t require them learn the language either. That should be first.


11 posted on 07/12/2019 11:33:57 AM PDT by b4its2late (A Liberal is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

There is a higher and more essential question:

Does the resident of the USA, citizen or not, have a sense of personal ownership in the USA?

That question determines their level of patriotic loyalty.

Personal ownership generally needs long term social integration, native language fluency, schooling, career, kids born in the USA, getting wealthier, etc.


12 posted on 07/12/2019 11:35:34 AM PDT by gandalftb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late

RE: We don’t require them learn the language either. That should be first.

Well, the USA does not (repeat NOT) have an of official language like the UK or Spain or China have.

English is de facto here, but not official. Just go to any Department of Transportation of your state and see if you have written tests only in English...


13 posted on 07/12/2019 11:40:33 AM PDT by SeekAndFind (look at Michigan, it will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

American values are exactly what the radical left wants to extinguish.


14 posted on 07/12/2019 11:54:21 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
“No country can import large numbers of people who hate it, and expect to survive.”

BINGO!

15 posted on 07/12/2019 11:57:14 AM PDT by GOPJ (MSNBC Bimbos & Pretentious men: EVERY CHILD RAPIST on Epstein's plane was a powerful democrat...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

You know, righteous ones like marxism, feminism, and the various qwertyisms.


16 posted on 07/12/2019 12:00:40 PM PDT by yuleeyahoo (The nation which can prefer disgrace to danger is prepared for a master and deserves one. Hamilton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind; wardaddy; Pelham; DiogenesLamp; Dick Bachert; GSWarrior; John S Mosby
Should we not develop a matrix of psychological attitudes or traits, indicative of a personality susceptible to best appreciate the social values of the Founders, in building a political society based on individual responsibility, to determine those best suited to be a part of the political economy, the Founders envisioned?

Doesn't the idea of a merit based standard require such an approach to screening applicants?

An American Immigration Policy

17 posted on 07/12/2019 12:07:54 PM PDT by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

America had huge amounts of immigrants in the early 20th century. But they were nearly all European, nearly all cultural Christians, they were not enticed or entitled with government benefits (meaning they were forced to be self-sufficient) and as Carlson points out, there was very strong pressure and education to assimilate and become Americans.

None of these points is true today. Its a recipe for strife and division.


18 posted on 07/12/2019 12:11:23 PM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Some, like The Atlantic’s Conor Friedersdorf, think it’s “absurd” to say that Omar proves anything, for better or worse, about America’s immigration system. “Isn’t getting elected to Congress a great achievement, and proof of assimilation?” he asks.

It takes some pretty defective wiring to consider a republic being governed by foreigners who hate it to be an "achievement."
19 posted on 07/12/2019 12:23:42 PM PDT by The Pack Knight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ohioan

We should have scrapped the 1965 immigration act decades ago and stopped importing the 3rd world. It has transformed California and much of the rest of the United States. I don’t remember anyone asking us if that is what we wanted.

The Democrats saw how this was playing out and have become a party openly hostile to native white Americans.

The Republican establishment figured out how they could make a buck off of it and they sat back and let the Democrats determine the future of what was once America.


20 posted on 07/12/2019 12:23:53 PM PDT by Pelham (Secure Voter ID. Mexico has it, because unlike us they take voting seriously)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson