[Lurker]

“he’s interested in the “systematic,” not individual, failures that allowed the FBI to spy on an opposing political campaign.”

And if he just happens to uncover criminal wrongdoings, what then?

L

[Liz]

........one Barr quote has gotten Democrats (and their media allies) agitated......
"What was the predicate for conducting a counterintelligence investigation on the Trump campaign?
How did the bogus narrative begin that Trump was in cahoots with Russia to interfere with the US election?"

A Wash/Po headline offered some salty snacks to nervous Dems:
"Barr offers yet another (cough) slanted quote about the Russia investigation."

===========================================

The stupid Dems are being played like a violin and they dont even know it.
The stupids found it "dishonest" that Barr would refer to a narrative
(debunked by an aggressive $30 million two-year independent counsel) as "bogus."

[Liz]

It is telling that those grouching about Barr's allegedly tacit accusation against Obama's DOJ have no problem
accusing Barr of running an improper investigation.

It's outrageous that Obama-era culprits were operating for purely political reasons.
<><> Former CIA director John Brennan spied on the legislative branch and lied about it to the American people.
<><> Former director of national intelligence James Clapper lied about spying on Americans thru a domestic surveillance program.
<><> The Obama administration spied on journalists and then prosecuted them.

[SkyPilot]

Dear Bill,

According to former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich and numerous independent investigations, over 97%+ of the political contributions of Dept of Justice (DOJ) employees went to Hillary.

It's one thing for the Dept of Agriculture bureaucrats to favor one party or candidate. It's quite another for the all powerful Dept of Injustice to be in the pocket of a cabal of criminals that is the Democrat party.

Those 97%+ Democrats are STILL there, and undermining the President and their oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States.

You have a big, big problem.

Knock of the bagpipes, the "brown bag" lunches with DOJ employees to "improve morale", and start firing some of these goons. Order every single DOJ employee to a virtual or telecon meeting, and read them the *%$# riot act.

Yesterday.

[knarf]

"Attorney General William Barr reiterated his intention to find out why."

THAT sir, is the core of the democrats madness..

We've listened for over two years to talking heads expound on the many scenarios that "could be" or probably was, but it took a serious Attorney General to actually strike fear in the hearts of the enemy.

I sincerely pray it all doesn't go down as just so much drama, but I have a lot of hope that the epstien arrest proves very fruitful in arrests and successful prosecutions.

They can't JFK another President AND an Attorney General.

[BOBWADE]

2 years and 40 million dollars later, no evidence of wrongdoing. Especially troubling as we have since learned about the horrible bias within investigators and the evil intent in their tactics. Without any evidence, a judge actually signed off on raiding an attorney's office to fish for evidence of a crime? Imagine the outrage if this had done against Obummer.

[bert]

https://www.forbes.com/sites/danalexander/2019/05/23/the-truth-behind-trump-moscow-how-the-president-risked-everything-for-a-relatively-tiny-deal/#60c368aabc32

Per the article........

“Robert Mueller did not find collusion to steal the 2016 election- but he did find evidence of collusion to try to make money”

[bramps]

Sorry to be so cynical, but part of me thinks Barr could be a final part of the plan to destroy the will of the people. Any sane person knows that heads should be rolling, literally, over this whole Russia collusion debacle. Barr’s words sound good, so he gives us hope. But if no very high-level people end up paying a price then what and has come from it all? Our hope has come to nothing and if someone like Trump and Barr can’t accomplish Justice, then why should we even think it any longer exists?

I don’t know if it was Pavlov, but I remember reading a study using dogs and giving them rewards based on what they accomplished. And if the dog learned that no matter what he tried to do basically accomplished nothing, eventually he just gave up. That’s what this reminds me of.

[SkyDancer]

Jail the perpetrators of that hoax.

[dead]

he's interested in the "systematic," not individual, failures that allowed the FBI to spy on an opposing political campaign.

The systemic failure is that individuals can break the law freely without fear of prosecution.

Hmmmmmm... what could be a possible solution to that systemic problem?