The Squad for president!
They’re more ‘popular’ than any other democratic candidate, or any democrat, as a matter of fact.
The disgusting Omar is an ill-mannered, felonious, declitorized inbred, an Islamist from a country that is a big cultural zero.
The creepy, slimy rag-head calls Trump supporters ignorant. That’s a lot like deplorable.
Tucker Carlson called this declitorized Muslim woman and self-proclaimd Somali refugee “someone who hates our country” and who came to the U.S. “at public expense,” noting that she “demanding the abolition of ICE, the decriminalization of illegal immigration itself, and an end to all deportation programs.”
“She demands open borders, the unlimited arrival of anyone who wants to come to America, whether they have anything to contribute or not; and taxpayers get to pay for it. And if you don’t want to, according to “the African” you’re a bigot,” Carlson said.
Tucker rightly tagged Omar “a livig symbol of America’s failed immigration system.” (Excerpt) Read more at bizpacreview.com ...
REFERENCE-—Ilhan Omar on Trump voters: ‘Ignorance really is pervasive
Fox News ^ | 5-22-19 | Cameron Cawthorne / FR Posted on 5/23/2019, 8:39:37 AM by SJackson
Democrat Rep. Ilhan Omar castigated supporters of President Donald Trump by claiming America’s problem with ignorance is “pervasive.” Omar appeared on the Nation’s “Next Left” podcast with host John Nichols to discuss various issues, including the intelligence of Trump supporters.
“So suddenly you’re elected, and you had this teaching moment. It strikes me that, in watching you, you are conscious of teaching moments and of that opportunity to say something that might cause people to think differently about what’s going on,” Nichols said.
Omar said U.S. voters “have a misconception” about refugees and the process they face getting into the United States. She went on to specifically target Republicans in her criticism, saying they “are really good at misinformation and sort of really reorganizing facts to sort of paint a picture that really eventually is not rooted in facts.” She said Minnesota Republicans who want to stop refugees from coming to the state spread misinformation about how refugee resettlement works. “There are agencies that run the resettlement program. This is a process that’s run through them. If you end that contract, it’s not that refugees are not going to be resettled, it’s that the state just doesn’t get informed,” Omar said.
“And so the only leverage you have is that you are part of this contract and you can be part of the negotiations on how many people get resettled in your state.” (Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
If it can be proven Illhan Omar lied applying for citizenship, she can be deported back to Somalia. Her project in improving her home country can then begin. For those unfamiliar with the facts, she allegedly used a sham marriage to a man who was, in fact, her brother to become a citizen here.
Law sources: Consequences of Providing False Testimony During Naturalization Interview
If you knowingly and intentionally provide false information (orally) during the naturalization interview and testing process--or if USCIS discovers that you falsely testified in order to gain immigration benefits in the past--you can expect your citizenship application to be denied. Or, if the lie is discovered later, USCIS can revoke (take away) a person's citizenship.
The naturalization interview is held "under oath," meaning that right from the start, you raise your right hand and swear to tell the truth. The immigration laws specifically say that, "No person shall be regarded as, or found to be, a person of good moral character who, during the period for which good moral character is required to be established [has] given false testimony for the purpose of obtaining any [immigration benefits]." (See the Immigration and Nationality Act (I.N.A.) Section 101(f)(6).)
As you probably know, receiving U.S. citizenship via the process of naturalization requires proving good moral character.
Depending on what a person lied about and the implications for their immigration status, there could also be further consequences, including being placed in removal proceedings and ultimately deported from the United States. For example, if a man was to lie during the naturalization interview and say that he was still married to the woman who helped get him a green card--and the fact that he was actually divorced was not only discovered, but led to a finding that the entire marriage had been a fraud--removal would be the likely consequence.
https://www.alllaw.com/articles/nolo/us-immigration/denial-citizenship-lies-false-statements-naturalization-applications.html
===========================================
Keep in mind...falsifying official documents is the preferred criminal method to cover-up larger crimes.
===============================================
REFERENCE--Falsifying Government Documents. involves altering, changing, or modifying a document for the purpose of deception.......can also involve forgery and/or passing copies of false documents. Falsifying documents is usually done in connection with broader criminal aims, such as extortion, government fraud, tax evasion, money laundering, financing terrorism........
Types of documents commonly falsified may include:
◾Tax returns and income statements
◾Personal checks
◾Bank account records
◾Business record keeping books
◾Immigration documents (such as visas, passports, etc.)
◾Identification cards and birth certificates
Many different types of acts can be considered as falsifying a document, including:
◾Altering or misrepresenting factual information such as prices or monetary amounts
◾Stating false information when requested to provide truthful statements
◾Forging a signature
◾Using official letterheads without authorization
◾Concealing assets or property WRT obtaining federal/state grants))
◾Knowingly using or distributing a fake document
A person can only be held criminally liable if they are deliberately acting with the intention of deceiving or defrauding another party.
Falsifying documents is a very serious offense and is generally classified as a felony. This means that a person charged with falsifying documents may be subject to the following legal penalties:
◾Having to pay a monetary fine
◾Incarceration in a prison facility
Depending on the gravity of the offense, as well as individual state laws, falsifying documents can result in a prison sentence of 5-10 years. Also, if government documents or authorities were involved, the legal penalties may be more severe. ..... legal penalties may increase with repeat offenses.
The penalty for falsifying government documents is outlined in the Crimes Act of 1958.