Posted on 07/19/2019 8:32:16 PM PDT by Impala64ssa
President Donald Trump berated New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman, recounting a phone conversation he had with the economist while playing golf. “Two weeks ago, while speaking to a friend on his cell phone, I, unfortunately, ended up speaking to Friedman,” Trump said. “We spoke for a while and he could not have been nicer or more respectful to your favorite President, me.” Trump described him as Thomas “the Chin” Friedman and said he was “a weak and pathetic sort of guy.” He specifically criticized Friedman’s column noting the fear Trump would be re-elected because of his economic policies, even though he was a “racist.” “I wasn’t surprised to hear so many people expressing fear that the racist, divisive, climate-change-denying, woman-abusing jerk who is our president was going to get re-elected, and was even seeing his poll numbers rise,” Friedman wrote. Trump ripped Friedman’s two-faced approach. “Really Nasty to me in his average I.Q. Columns, kissed my a.. on the call,” Trump wrote about Friedman. “Phony!” The president also challenged Friedman’s praise of Rhode Island’s Democrat Governor Gina Raimondo, for reducing unemployment in her state, without giving Trump any credit.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
PDJT does another schmuck-toss!
Friedman is such an out of touch retard.
Isn’t his paper on life support?
[[Isn’t his paper on life support?]]
These fools work for a billionaire’s tax write off.
‘zactly...
Oh my stars! Oh Lawd! Trump has got to stay off of Twitter and be above the fray! < /Hyperventilating FReepers and NeverTrumpers >
Shouldn’t a columnist for the New York Times be expected to come up with a more original adjective for attacking Donald Trump with than “racist” — the moronic all-purpose epithet that has become so overused it’s lost all meaning?
New York Times readers not only get fake news, they also have to read it written by second-rate writers.
Go after LIB losers, Mr. President .
Friedman is a loser and President Trump should never apologize nor pander to someone who admires China’s policies.
Why must we continue to suffer through some “journalist”’s interpretation of the President’s tweets when we can simply read the tweets by ourselves and make our own interpretations?
I mean, I like Breitbart and all but. like the rest of the media, we really don’t need them to tell us what to think when we can simply read the tweets and make up our own minds. That’s kind of the point of the President writing them isn’t it?
If they’re not going to actually do investigate journalism work but simply regurgitate someone’s tweets, why bother?
Troller in chief lib psychiatrist are doing booming business so many heads exploding may God grabbing t the great a third term
If they’re not going to actually do investigate journalism work but simply regurgitate someone’s tweets, why bother?
* * *
Well, consider this. A journalist spending a couple hours to spread the word about Trump’s fabulous tweet is a small price to pay for taking down the Corrupt Fake News. Not everybody is on Twitter.
Hey, be kind......saying "racist" is the only way the boogaloos get to "feel good" about themselves......(sniffle)
And you are just finding this out NOW about Thomas Friedman?
Some of us have known what he is for 20+ years.
I don’t read the Racist New York Times.
Any paper that hires and sticks with an open and avowed racist like Sarah Jeong must itself be deemed racist.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.