Posted on 07/21/2019 8:35:51 PM PDT by be-baw
“Trump doesnt defer to their titles and positions. Hes in charge - so he ribs them all.”
That’s consistent with everything I’ve heard about and seen of Trump. He often says how he likes having people with differing viewpoints advising him. He can do this because God has blessed him with many things, including a strong moral compass.
The dog analogy occurred to me too. You may wish you could have some nice cuddly little mutt who follows you everywhere and can’t lick you enough, but when the bad guys show up, you want the meanest most aggressive SOB by your side.
The elites get their jobs because they know the right people. They think themselves more clever than others through sheer accident of their success.
Bolton is staying because he knows what Trump likes and he gives it to him. Mattis left because he knew what Trump likes and couldn’t give it to him. Trump wants a strong independent US foreign policy, which Bolton favors while Mattis wanted a multilateral US foreign policy.
As long as Bolton doesn’t go against Trump, he’ll stay.
Yep
Scott Adams predicted before Bolton came on board that he would be useful to POTUS as the 'bad cop'. Yet another prediction of Adams' that was spot-on.
POTUS is indeed a VSG*. All the people working for him are mere tools that he uses, with surgical skill, at the appropriate juncture.
He is the greatest president of my lifetime. (And, as an old Reaganaut, for me that is saying something. I still love The Gipper as if he had been my own Grand-Uncle, and that will never change....but... THIS MAN FIGHTS!!!!!!!!)
Maybe that's what's going on here. I can't see anyone controlling Donald Trump.
It is dangerous to exaggerate the lessons of the last war into fixed policies that become obsolete as soon as they are uttered. Evolving technology, shifting alliances and historical changes all make devotion to rigid rules dangerous. The old shibboleth, generals are always prepared to fight the last war should not be entirely discounted. The fact that Iraq was a major blunder, at least in its consequences, does not mean that there will never be another war that should be waged. The fact that the liberation of Kuwait was a brilliant success, does not mean that the invasion of Iraq was a good idea. The idea that Vietnam was a tragic experience does not mean that the liberation of Kuwait should not have been undertaken.
Rather than playing the shallow game of destroying personalities or indulging in the Supreme Court's favorite method of decision-making, working backward from a conclusion, perhaps we ought to approach the problem of Iran by trying to answer the question, what price are we willing to pay to prevent Iran getting the bomb? Or put another way, what cost will we pay as a result of permitting Iran to get the bomb? Finally, what options besides war are available to prevent Iran getting the bomb?
And, by the way, Donald Trump is a GREAT CEO
It must be fun to work for Trump.
“It must be fun to work for Trump.”
It sure is fun watching him. Far and away, the most entertaining leader in world history.
Most importantly, Trump recognizes Boltons tremendous deep and wide experience in international affairs. His resume is impressive.
Exactly.
Only an imbecile demRINO believes that Bolton has the ability to drag the President into a war.
President Trump has been remarkably restrained about foreign entanglements; in sharp contrast to the peacenik who came before him.
I think were seeing a combination of a phenomenal intuition and gift for sizing people up, honed by decades of unique real world experience.
It often occurs to me that President Trump spent decades not only running multiple businesses; but, also negotiating multimillion dollar international deals. That meant working with all kinds of characters, from all over the globe. A lot of those characters were pretty sketch, Im sure.
This is what President Trump brings to the table.
Obama kept Valerie Jarrett around, Trump keeps John Bolton around. Which would YOU prefer?
I like that Bolton stood up to Mattis. He saw through his hidden Democrat superior hide and called him on it. I really believe it was Mattis that wrote that cabinet resistance op ed in NYT. Glad Bolton’s voice is in the room.
If Trump is using Bolton as his ‘pit bull on a leash’ to show troublesome countries they need to fear causing trouble that’s not such a bad thing.
As long as Trump can keep Bolton on a leash.
If Bolton (via his neo-con handlers) wormed his way into the administration to provoke conflicts then Trump has made a huge mistake.
*
Yeh, my problem with Bolton is he forgets that he isnt setting foreign policy. And, he often strays off the reservation shooting off his fat mouth. I dont like him, never have, never will.
Most communists don’t.
“John,” Trump asked, “Is Ireland one of those countries you want to invade?”
It must be fun to work for Trump.
___________________
I wonder if his answer was “Not yet, Mr. President.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.