Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mathematical Challenges to Darwin’s Theory of Evolution with Berlinski, Meyer, and Gelernter
Hoover Institution - Uncommon Knowledge ^ | 7/22/2019 | Stephen Meyer, David Berlinski, David Gelernter, Peter Robinson

Posted on 07/28/2019 10:50:40 AM PDT by Tennessean4Bush

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-120 last
To: TexasGator

If it is a lie, then name something that scientists would accept as falsification of the theory.


101 posted on 07/30/2019 3:18:24 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

Why don’t you tell me what would falsify evolution, instead of your seemingly unending stream of fact-free statements? If you knew what you were able to explain what you were talking about you would do that. You carefully avoid any discussion whatsoever of the actual theory.


102 posted on 07/30/2019 4:07:29 PM PDT by lasereye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

You are totally confusing math and science.


103 posted on 07/30/2019 4:12:03 PM PDT by TexasGator (Z1z)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: lasereye

“Why don’t you tell me what would falsify evolution, “

You made the claim. Go do your own homework.


104 posted on 07/30/2019 4:13:04 PM PDT by TexasGator (Z1z)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

You seem to be playing some psychotic game where you keep replying without any logical/factual content.


105 posted on 07/30/2019 4:20:06 PM PDT by lasereye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: lasereye

“You seem to be playing some psychotic game where you keep replying without any logical/factual content.”

Just alerted that you posted a false statement and should go do your homework. My statement is factual and logical.


106 posted on 07/30/2019 4:48:08 PM PDT by TexasGator (Z1z)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

Sorry, but you’re the only one doing that, as demonstrated by the article I posted from a scientist with a PhD who actually works in the field of evolution. It’s quite obvious you don’t have the credentials or even a basic level of familiarity with the subject to argue with him.


107 posted on 07/31/2019 8:31:08 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator; lasereye

“Go do your own homework.”

Translated from Gatorese: “I don’t know but I am too stubborn and dishonest to admit when I am wrong.”


108 posted on 07/31/2019 8:32:47 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

“Sorry, but you’re the only one doing that, as demonstrated by the article I posted from a scientist with a PhD who actually works in the field of evolution. It’s quite obvious you don’t have the credentials or even a basic level of familiarity with the subject to argue with him.”

Why would I argue with him. I am very happy that you agree his thoughts.


very, very, very, very, very unlikely, that the theory of evolution by natural and sexual selection may one day turn out to be false. But then again, it is also possible, albeit very, very, very, very, very unlikely, that monkeys will fly out of my ass tomorrow. In my judgment, both events are about equally likely.”


109 posted on 07/31/2019 8:59:03 AM PDT by TexasGator (Z1z)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

A simple google or reading of a textbook proves your statement false. Stop spreading fake science.


110 posted on 07/31/2019 9:00:49 AM PDT by TexasGator (Z1z)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

Evolution has been disproved. It’s fake science.


111 posted on 07/31/2019 10:30:59 AM PDT by lasereye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: lasereye

hmm. So you did your homework and now have no reasonable response.


112 posted on 07/31/2019 10:50:41 AM PDT by TexasGator (Z1z)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

Do your homework.


113 posted on 07/31/2019 10:53:45 AM PDT by lasereye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator
"A simple google or reading of a textbook proves your statement false."

That you have to google this shows you don't really know what you are talking about. Also, textbooks... well, they aren't the most accurate source on this subject, according to the National Science Teaching Association itself:

A Gentle Reminder that a Hypothesis is Never Proven Correct, nor is a Theory Ever Proven to Be True

114 posted on 07/31/2019 10:55:47 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

“Why would I argue with him.”

Because he flatly refutes the false assertion that you made. If you don’t argue with him, but only argue with me when I dispute that same assertion, then you aren’t arguing honestly or consistently.

“I am very happy that you agree his thoughts.”

I agree with his assertion of the fact that theories are never proven, which is what the issue at hand is. He even agrees to this in what you quoted (”But then again, it is also possible...”), so if you agree with him, then you have tacitly admitted you were wrong.


115 posted on 07/31/2019 11:06:40 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

Your source in reference to global warming:

“These two theories have passed the test of time, “


116 posted on 07/31/2019 11:33:32 AM PDT by TexasGator (Z1z)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

LOL. The issue is that you posted a false statement. Do you want me to repost it?


117 posted on 07/31/2019 11:36:17 AM PDT by TexasGator (Z1z)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

“The issue is that you posted a false statement.”

Sorry, but you are the one who made the false statement. I’ve so far posted two sources by credentialed professionals refuting your assertion (that scientific theories are proved), and you haven’t offered a single source of any similar authority to support your false assertion.

Of course, that is your standard MO, you just say things with no evidence to back them up.


118 posted on 07/31/2019 11:49:20 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

Here is the lie you supported:

“Evolution theory doesn’t even qualify as true science since there’s no stated condition which would falsify it.”


119 posted on 07/31/2019 12:14:27 PM PDT by TexasGator (Z1z)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

ID declares that God is dead? Really? One can see all the workings of God in His design, even though understanding of ORIGINS of the billions of miracles within organic life is impossible.


120 posted on 08/01/2019 7:31:59 AM PDT by alstewartfan ("The strangest women run wild down there Covered head to toe with Fur and hair." Al Stewart in Hanno)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-120 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson