And that's all this dishrag, handwringing cuck article is.
From a kid who goes to Swarthmore for God's sake.
Radicalizing GOP? Being against an outright invasion is “radical”? Saying that foreign nationals in the country illegally have no right to taxpayer money is “extreme”?
The Mexican separatist attack on 187 using Mariana Pfaelzer’s judicial veto of the voter's will was what destroyed California and has turned it into a Mexican protectorate. Gray Davis consolidated that veto by failing to appeal her rulings to the Supreme Court where most of her crap would have been overturned.
And there are other things that the pasty faced little intern from the Kremlin on the Crum didn't get: 187 was intentionally written to counteract Plyler v. Doe so that the SCOTUS would be forced to revisit that outrageous decision.
There's nothing radical about 187. What was radical is the illegal overturning of the voter's will by Pfaelzer on the Federal level and Davis by his scam of taking 187 to the Arbitration Service of the 9th Circuit where it was killed.
Davis was recalled because of that. A lot of people think it was the power outages that summer, but that was just the final trigger for that POS.
NR is a joke. There's nothing “conservative” about mass immigration, mass illegal invasion, and handing over taxpayer cash to the invaders. The real reason the Republicans are gone from CA now is simple: they didn't make 187 their centerpiece after Wilson left office. Dan Lungren ran to the Left by downplaying 187 and got trampled for it.
Invasion is not a civil right. California is now ruled by an illegitimate gang of foreigners bent of stomping on the success of the hated Gringo. The Democrat party in this state is a gang of doctrinaire Bolsheviks who strangled the legitimate vote of the People. There is no democracy in California now, just the rule of a vicious gang.