Bergman calls his prime example, Gelenter, “leading” and “esteemed”, but nowhere in the entire article does he mention that Gelenter is a professor of computer science, not any form of biology. It’s almost as if he knew it would really undercut his (implied) premise that evolutionary professionals were rejecting the theory.
******************************************************
Why the ad hominem? Are you claiming biologists have all the answers?
I said nothing positive or negative about the man. I pointed out his field of study and questioned why the author didn’t mention it.
>>Are you claiming biologists have all the answers?<<
Moreso than mathematicians or other specialists. It is like saying a geologist is qualified to speak to medical issues.