Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Boogieman; semimojo; fishtank
Boogieman: "Well, DNA is a programming language.
Computer scientists are certainly qualified to comment on biologists’ inane theory that a programming language can write itself."

Suppose we stipulate that nothing in the Universe "writes itself" or ever does anything outside the bounds of our Creator's intentions?

The scientifically relevant question then becomes, did our Creator Himself individually mold every one of millions of species on earth, or could He not allow His "natural processes" (i.e., evolution) to do at least some of the work for Him?

Can we even reliably tell which DNA modifications were made indirectly by "nature" and which directly by nature's Creator?
So, for scientific purposes, is there any reason to reach beyond science's natural boundaries to find supernatural explanations for observed speciation?

89 posted on 08/10/2019 6:51:37 AM PDT by BroJoeK ((a little historical perspective...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: BroJoeK

“So, for scientific purposes, is there any reason to reach beyond science’s natural boundaries to find supernatural explanations for observed speciation?”

When the only natural process that scientists can propose to account for speciation is statistically impossible, then yes, I think we have a good reason.


184 posted on 08/12/2019 7:29:16 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson