[CurlyDave]

Then we may as well throw in the towel now, because what he is proposing is the death of the second amendment.

I completely disagree.

The President is not responsible for telling us what the 2A means. The Supreme Court is responsible for telling us the meaning of the 2A.

If DJT is re-elected I really think he will get at least two more Justices, and maybe a third to replace Thomas. So we get two extra conservatives who have the temperament to understand the real meaning of the 2A.

I don't think we can count on Roberts when the chips are down, but re-electing Trump gives us a 6 - 1 - 2 court. A couple of well-selected cases, and the 2A is safe for a generation or more.

Go ahead, name anyone who can do better.

DJT is learning politics and political grandstanding -- I suspect nothing at all is going to make it through Congress.

[Lurkinanloomin]

I don’t need the Supreme Court to tell me what “shall not be infringed” means.

[Yogafist]

I don’t have to name anyone who can do it better. Trump needs to explain how trampling on the rights of many will protect a few. And relying on our judicial system, which long ago became politicized, and replaced the Constitution with political desires is a fool’s errand.