[CondoleezzaProtege]

And you will be left with the socialist as president. Who will do far more than red flags.

[Lurkinanloomin]

As Jefferson said, You won’t need the 2nd Amendment until they try to take it.

[familyop]

"And you will be left with the socialist as president. Who will do far more than red flags."

That is correct, although events gin'd up by the neo-neo-Democrats could become most interesting around big cities. If suburban sophisticates want red flags, may they--men *and* women--try to cope with real red flags up close and personal. No sense in letting rural men have all of the fun.

[familyop]

And if aforementioned suburban sophisticates would not cotton to some fun with Democrat-driven collapse, maybe they could consider being more friendly with the original Americana of our Second Amendment.

[fruser1]

A socialist president that might actually get resistance from the RINOs in congress. Trump’s RINOs will fight him when it’s good for the country and join him when it’s bad.

[Black Agnes]

Given who runs the alphabet agencies, and doesn’t change out with elections, it won’t matter WHO is president if these laws are passed. You will be adjudicated by career government employees who are uniformly liberal in their leanings.

If these laws are passed do you think it won’t become literally dangerous to even voice support for a conservative presidential candidate? Much less donate to one?

If these pass, Trump will be the last Republican president. It will simply be too personally dangerous to even have a sign in your yard.

Or Post on a political website.

Or Donate to a pro life candidate.

Or Possibly even regularly attend a conservative evangelical church. Can’t you see some wackjob driving through the parking lot writing down license plate numbers to ‘report’?