If they are so dangerous why not commit them?
So you take away the guns and they run a car up a curb or jump off a bridge.
The only red flag here is that the law is focused on the gun not the person.
The only red flag here is that the law is focused on the gun not the person.
i.e. it IS focused on the person.
But for it to work, it needs tons of safeguards to prevent it being used as a form of “swatting”. And it can’t be enforced, “long term” without more than just a judge thinking a guy might, possibly, maybe do something bad. There needs to be some sort of definable threshold.
One good one would be two or more witnesses testifying that you have made actionable threats, on or off line.
It falls into the concept of “an armed society is a polite society”, by adding the corrolary, “if you own a gun, and you threaten someone on or off line, expect that gun to be taken away from you for a time.”