Agree completely about the Amazon Post. The biggest news this week comes from the leaking of the townhall meeting at the NYT. It shows the bias and lack of journalism of Pravda on the Hudson. It is outrageous and infuriating. One exchange really got my blood boiling.
Staffer: Hello, I have another question about racism. Im wondering to what extent you think that the fact of racism and white supremacy being sort of the foundation of this country should play into our reporting. Just because it feels to me like it should be a starting point, you know? Like these conversations about what is racist, what isnt racist. I just feel like racism is in everything. It should be considered in our science reporting, in our culture reporting, in our national reporting. And so, to me, its less about the individual instances of racism, and sort of how were thinking about racism and white supremacy as the foundation of all of the systems in the country. And I think particularly as we are launching a 1619 Project, I feel like thats going to open us up to even more criticism from people who are like, OK, well youre saying this, and youre producing this big project about this. But are you guys actually considering this in your daily reporting?
Baquet: You know, its interesting, the argument you just made, to go back to the use of the word racist. I didnt agree with all of this from Keith Woods, who I know from New Orleans and whos the ombudsman for NPR. He wrote a piece about why he wouldnt have used the word racist, and his argument, which is pretty provocative, boils down to this: Pretty much everything is racist. His view is that a huge percentage of American conversation is racist, so why isolate this one comment from Donald Trump? His argument is that he could cite things that people say in their everyday lives that we dont characterize that way, which is always interesting. You know, I dont know how to answer that, other than I do think that that race has always played a huge part in the American story.
And I do think that race and understanding of race should be a part of how we cover the American story. Sometimes news organizations sort of forget that in the moment. But of course it should be. I mean, one reason we all signed off on the 1619 Project and made it so ambitious and expansive was to teach our readers to think a little bit more like that. Race in the next yearand I think this is, to be frank, what I would hope you come away from this discussion withrace in the next year is going to be a huge part of the American story. And I mean, race in terms of not only African Americans and their relationship with Donald Trump, but Latinos and immigration. And I think that one of the things I would love to come out of this with is for people to feel very comfortable coming to me and saying, heres how I would like you to consider telling that story. Because the reason you have a diverse newsroom, to be frank, is so that you can have people pull together to try to tell that story. I think thats the closest answer I can come.
No wonder the world of journalism is now being led by citizen journalists.They are the only ones who can sort out BS from news.
Thank you for posting the actual comments. The section you highlight is odd. On the one hand the editor states he has a “diverse” newsroom where writers are welcome to converse with him on any idea. On the other hand, he states that he wants his writers to slant every single article in one direction.
Critical thinking skills absent in this gent.