Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Can Nanotechnology Protect Military Equipment in Transit?
news.clearancejobs.com ^ | 8/13/19 | Peter Suciu

Posted on 08/19/2019 7:10:58 AM PDT by spacejunkie2001

Last month it was reported that a crew of international con artists allegedly convinced a U.S. defense contractor to ship out millions of dollars worth of sensitive military hardware. In 2017, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) made up a fictitious law enforcement agency website and address and was able to convince the Department of Defense to supply more than a million dollars in military equipment.

These two stories highlight how military equipment is all too often shipped out without any way of it actually being tracked once it leaves the warehouse. In the case of the scammers, who used fake IDs and a phony shipping address, they made off with merchandize worth more than $10.6 million, including $3.2 million in classified gear.

“Shrinkage” – the retail term for stolen merchandize – is actually a common problem in the world of military defense hardware. While sensitive hardware and weapons generally aren’t the items stolen, more common items such as batches of hard drives, memory cards and other computer hardware disappears on routine basis.

The commercial world also deals with the so-called issue of “it fell off the truck,” but in recent years has begun to use RFID (radio-frequency identification), which utilizes an electromagnetic field to automatically identify and track tags attached to objects. Unlike with barcodes, these tags do not need to be within the line of sight of a reader, and can be embedded in the tracked object.

RFID could be “downsized” so that it is harder to even know it is there.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.clearancejobs.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: locatorx; military; nanotechnology; theft
this is an interesting tracking product as it can protect against theft of products, IP threat, etc. Looks like a co called LocatorX is leading the charge
1 posted on 08/19/2019 7:10:58 AM PDT by spacejunkie2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: spacejunkie2001

The limitation of RFID being used to track stuff is that it does not transmit on it’s own. The chip must be pinged by a reader. No reader, no tracking.


2 posted on 08/19/2019 7:43:44 AM PDT by jimtorr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimtorr

Not to mention, rfid readers need to be extremely close to the chips in order to read them.


3 posted on 08/19/2019 8:25:11 PM PDT by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

*ping*


4 posted on 08/20/2019 12:17:04 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Who will think of the gerbils ? Just say no to Buttgiggity !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
International con artists did that? That Christopher Steele has his fingers in *everything*. /s

5 posted on 08/20/2019 6:43:00 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson