Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How The United States Can Support Self-Rule In Hong Kong Without Starting A War
The Federalist ^ | 08/19/2019 | Helen Raleigh

Posted on 08/19/2019 8:24:57 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

As the crisis in Hong Kong deepens, many Americans are asking: Should the United States intervene and stand by Hong Kong protesters? How can the United States effectively intervene without committing its military and resources to another long, expensive, and futile nation-building effort?

Before answering these questions, we should establish several key understandings about Hong Kong. Since the 1997 handover, Beijing exercises sovereignty over Hong Kong. But Hong Kong is different from every other Chinese city.

“The One Country, Two Systems” agreement signed by both the U.K. and China when the former stopped ruling Hong Kong stated that while China is in charge of Hong Kong’s defense and foreign policy, Hong Kong’s social and economic systems should remain unchanged, and Hong Kong “will be vested with executive, legislative and independent judicial power, including that of final adjudication.”

As a separate customs territory and economic entity from the rest of China, Hong Kong is able to enter international agreements, join international organizations, maintain its own currency and foreign reserves, and issue its own travel documents. The extradition bill Hong Kong authorities have pushed at China’s behest will damage Hong Kong’s independent judicial system and endanger Hong Kongers’ political freedom.

Why the United States Should Back Hong Kong

The United States should intervene, for at least four reasons. First, the United States has significant economic interests in Hong Kong. According to the U.S. State Department, “There are more than 1,300 U.S. firms, including 726 regional operations, and approximately 85,000 American residents in Hong Kong.”

Data from the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative shows that Hong Kong alone was the United States’s 10th-largest export market, and the United States enjoys a trade surplus of $33.8 billion with the city. Hong Kong also received more than $80 billion in U.S. foreign direct investment as of 2017. Thus, any effort to maintain the city’s free-market economic system is good for America and many Americans’ prosperity.

Second, a politically free Hong Kong is good for U.S. national security. Hong Kong is an active member of U.S.-led counterterrorism efforts and plays an important role in tracking and cutting off funding for criminal and terrorist organizations and curtailing money laundering . The city also has long served as a window for outsiders to peek into the rest of China. Historically, the free access to the city enabled the West to gather information and intelligence about China.

U.S. Navy warships used to make regular port calls in Hong Kong, sometimes averaging 60-70 visits annually before 1997. As recently as this week, China denied U.S. Navy port visits to the city occasionally as a punishment for what it calls the United States meddling with China’s internal affairs. As Hong Kong’s political climate worsens, the U.S. Navy may lose its access to the city more regularly or even indefinitely. Therefore, helping Hong Kong maintain its political freedom and independent judicial system is important to our national security.

Third, the U.S. and China are engaging in a strategic competition. The U.S.-led liberal world order has maintained peace and prosperity for most of the world for seven decades since the end of World War II. In 1989, the United States and Western powers gave the Chinese government a pass after its brutal crackdown on a pro-democracy movement in Tiananmen Square, hoping continued economic engagement would make China more democratic. In the last three decades, however, China has become more authoritarian, more powerful, and has found more ways to challenge the United States and cause serious harm worldwide.

Especially under President Xi Jinping, China has greatly expanded its political and economic influence and military presence around the world, aiming to replace the liberal world order with an authoritarian model with Chinese characteristics. No country other than the United States has the economic and military power to push back.

If the United States does nothing and just lets China crack down on Hong Kong like another Tiananmen, countries around the world will read this as a definite win for China, and a defeat for the United States and the post-World War II liberal order. We will see more countries, even some of our allies, fall into China’s orbit, which won’t be good for U.S. security and prosperity.

Last but not least, the United States should intervene and stand by Hong Kong protesters for a moral reason. Since its founding, the United States has served the unique role of being “the last best hope of earth,” in the words of Abraham Lincoln, and “a shining city upon a hill whose beacon light guides freedom-loving people everywhere,” according to Ronald Reagan.

This is why in 1989, students erected a Chinese version of Lady Liberty in Tiananmen Square and read out loud “The Declaration of Independence.” This is also why Hong Kong protesters were seen waving American flags and singing the American national anthem.

How the United States Can Help

Trump has avoided criticizing China and hasn’t offered any verbal support to Hong Kongers in the last few months. But his dancing around the issue has done nothing to persuade Xi to sign a trade deal. Instead, China blames the United States as a black hand behind the protests, and even doxed the names of a U.S. diplomat’s husband and children after she met several Hong Kong protesters.

The United States has a moral responsibility to extend a helping hand to anyone who seeks freedom and is up against the iron fist of tyranny. Given the city’s unique status, the United States can help freedom-seeking Hong Kongers in three ways.

The 1992 United States-Hong Kong Policy Act obligates the United States to “promote Hong Kong’s prosperity, autonomy, and way of life.” Hong Kong’s past autonomy enables it to enjoy special economic treatment from the United States.

Republican Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida and Democratic Sen. Ben Cardin of Maryland introduced a bill in June, titled “Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act,” requiring “the U.S. Secretary of State to issue an annual certification of Hong Kong’s autonomy to justify special treatment under the U.S. Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992.” It also requires the U.S. president to “identify persons responsible for the abduction of several booksellers and other individuals from Hong Kong and subject them to U.S. sanctions.” Congress needs to pass this bill and send it to President Trump for signature.

Another way to intervene is to use the Global Magnitsky Act, which allows the United States to “impose visa bans and targeted sanctions on individuals anywhere in the world responsible for committing human rights violations or acts of significant corruption.” If the Trump administration signals it will use the Global Magnitsky Act to freeze assets and prevent travel of anyone who committed human rights violations in Hong Kong, be it government officials, police, and military officers, they may think twice before the next violent crackdown because many of them have foreign bank accounts and families living abroad.

The third way the United States can help is for the Trump administration to designate a special process to speed up the application and approval process for any Hong Kongers seeking political asylum in the United States. Hong Kongers are well-educated, they’re well-versed in democracy, most speak English, and they want freedom. They would be a good addition to our great nation.

Hong Kongers are fighting for something we Americans know very well: freedom and the right to self-determination. We can and should help them.


Helen Raleigh is a senior contributor to The Federalist. An immigrant from China, she is the owner of Red Meadow Advisors, LLC, and an immigration policy fellow at the Centennial Institute in Colorado. She is the author of several books, including "Confucius Never Said" and "The Broken Welcome Mat."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: china; hongkong; selfrule; trumpasia

1 posted on 08/19/2019 8:24:57 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; 2ndDivisionVet; azishot; ...

p


2 posted on 08/19/2019 8:32:01 AM PDT by bitt (Age wrinkles the body. Quitting wrinkles the soul - Douglas MacArthur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

We need to be firm with China on Hong Kong, but quiet. Public face is very important in Asia, and in China in particular. We should avoid publicly saying what we would do, forcing the Chinese to defend their face by defying us. Rather, we should let them know quietly what actions we would take, and be prepared to carry them out. Speak softly and carry a big stick.


3 posted on 08/19/2019 8:34:29 AM PDT by Petrosius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Hillary Crinton would have bombed Hong Kong by now


4 posted on 08/19/2019 8:37:44 AM PDT by dsrtsage (For Leftists, World History starts every day at breakfast)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

If there is any cap for immigration impacting Hong Kong and not the rest of China we should get rid of it for a set period of time in order to enable anyone who wants out to be able to get out. We should screen with an eye toward avoiding Chinese military infiltration. I dont think streamlining is the answer though since China presents a huge threat to our security. This is a special situation where these guys will be hunted like dogs if we don’t help.


5 posted on 08/19/2019 8:45:42 AM PDT by BlackAdderess (Why does Harvard invest in developing world land grabs that harm indigenous people, then yell at us?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Self rule or independence will never happen in Hong Kong while the successors of the Butchers of Beijing are in power.

The West was able to spend the USSR into oblivion. We won't be able to do that with China.

The world's advanced nations (the US,Europe,Japan,etc) made a huge,huge,*huge* mistake when they opened their ports to Chinese made goods in the 80s and 90s.

6 posted on 08/19/2019 8:51:01 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (A joke: Brennan,Comey and Lynch walk into a Barr...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petrosius

The U.S. should stay the hell out of it, unless we first want to issue a formal apology to the Confederacy and then pay those states about a quadrillion dollars in reparations.


7 posted on 08/19/2019 9:00:46 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Knowledge makes a man unfit to be a slave." -- Frederick Douglass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

China rules Hong Kong, and will.

At best Hong Kong can have some autonomy.

The original issue was where trials must take place.

The US Constitution requires a trial in a place where the alleged crime occurred. That is sound judicial policy and China should follow it. Witnesses are most likely to be available and its generally the most convenient place for the person charged with a crime.


8 posted on 08/19/2019 9:01:49 AM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I think something rotten is going on.

Chinese can be very vocal, but destroying Chinese property in their own city isn’t normal Chinese behavior.

I sense a more modern Reichstag fire moment.

Governments are always looking for excuses to seize more power.


9 posted on 08/19/2019 9:06:06 AM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Has the author met a tar-baby they didn’t like?
There are few if any good options, here, and too much posturing can lead to people in Hong Kong having false confidence that will end up in massacres. We are not going to war over the rights of Hong Kong’s citizens, no matter what China does. Trump would do well to resist the usual political pressure to appear to be doing something. We can call for calm and compromise, voice expectations for a non-violent solution, maybe try to get the UN involved (not the US) in mediation efforts.


10 posted on 08/19/2019 9:14:17 AM PDT by Chewbarkah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

the hong kong solution:

1. help california formally secede from the nation (extend the wall north between nation of california & AZ, NV, & OR)
2. add hong kong as 50th state to replace cali


11 posted on 08/19/2019 9:20:15 AM PDT by thinden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Brian Griffin

RE: Chinese can be very vocal, but destroying Chinese property in their own city isn’t normal Chinese behavior.

Out of nearly 2 million people who participated in the protests here and there, there were a few thousands who participated in the violence that deface private property, including attacking the Police.

There will always be bad eggs in such a huge population.

The question is this -— WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THESE VIOLENCE?

I’ve spoken to HK and Chinese friends here and there and I get different answers:

* Young college and western influenced youths

* Thugs who infiltrated the protest paid for by the Chinese government who wanted to foment riots to create an excuse for sending Chinese troops to HK.

* a USA and Western instigated and paid for group designed to destabilize China.


12 posted on 08/19/2019 9:35:29 AM PDT by SeekAndFind (look at Michigan, it will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Bring back the tariffs? Why not? Kill two birds with one stone. Silence the fake patriots on both sides of the aisle that put commerce with China ahead of the best interests of their country.


13 posted on 08/19/2019 3:09:08 PM PDT by Sam Gamgee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dsrtsage

Chairman pant suits? I don’t think so.


14 posted on 08/19/2019 3:09:35 PM PDT by Sam Gamgee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson