Posted on 08/21/2019 1:22:23 AM PDT by Kaslin
President Donald Trump promised he'd get rid of bad rules.
"Remove the anchor dragging us down!" he said when campaigning for president. "We're going to cancel every needless job-killing regulation!"
Trump was a developer, so he knew that the thicket of rules government imposes often makes it impossible to get things done.
But would he keep his deregulation promise? I was skeptical.
Republicans often talk deregulation but then add rules. People called President George W. Bush an "anti-regulator." But once he was president, he hired 90,000 new regulators!
Trump has been different.
When he took office, he hired regulation skeptics. He told government agencies: Get rid of two regulations for every new one you add.
I think his anti-regulation attitude is why stock prices rose and unemployment dropped. Trump sent a message to business: Government will no longer try to crush you. Businesses then started hiring.
Of course, the media wasn't happy. Reporters love regulation.
They call Trump's moves "an attack on the environment" and on "workers' health." The New York Times ran the headline "Donald Trump Is Trying to Kill You!"
What the media don't get is that regulations have unintended side effects that often outweigh the good they're intended to do.
Cars built smaller to comply with President Obama's rules that require doubling of gas mileage cause increased deaths because smaller cars provide less protection.
"Should the government tell you what kind of car to buy?" asks Grover Norquist of Americans for Tax Reform in my new video about Trump.
Norquist says that Trump has largely kept his deregulation promise, and that's been great for America.
For example, Trump repealed the Obama-era plan to classify franchise businesses like McDonald's as one single business. Why?
"The trial lawyers want to be able to sue all of McDonald's, not just the local McDonald's, if they spill coffee on themselves," says Norquist. "And the labor unions want to unionize all McDonald's, not just the one store. That would have been a disaster."
Trump's FCC repealed Obama's "net neutrality" rule, which would have limited internet providers' freedom to charge different prices.
Democrats and other regulation-lovers predicted repeal would mean that rich people would dominate the internet. Bernie Sanders even tweeted that repeal would mean "the end of the internet as we know it."
Of course, none of those things happened. Or as Norquist puts it: "None of it! None of it!"
But some Obama regulations sounded so important.
Norquist laughs at that. "The names for these regulations are written by regulators. They're advertisements for themselves."
Of course, unlike advertisers, regulators don't list side effects of their rules, which Norquist says should read: "May cause unemployment, may reduce wages, may raise the cost of energy, may make your car not drivable."
Trump's deregulation record would be better were he not so eager to add regulations, such as tariffs, at the same time.
"There is a challenge. Trump is a protectionist in many ways," says Norquist, sadly. "Tariffs are taxes, and regulations on the border are regulations on consumers."
So are Trump's "buy American" rules.
"That sounds like a good idea, but it's a dumb idea, and I wish he hadn't done it," says Norquist. "That is not deregulation. The good news is that the vast majority of the acts have been deregulatory and tremendously helpful."
Recently, Trump announced, "We have cut 22 regulations for every new regulation!"
He exaggerated, as he often does. The real number is about five. But that's still pretty good. Better than Ronald Reagan did.
I wish Trump would do more.
I wish he'd remove his tariffs and agricultural subsidies and kill the Export-Import Bank, drug prohibition and the onerous rules that encourage illegal immigration by making it almost impossible for foreigners to work here legally.
Keep your promise, President Trump! Repeal 22 regulations for every new one!
Nevertheless, so far, mostly good.
Every excessive rule repealed is a step in the right direction: toward freedom.
How about some consumer protection from CNN, (MS)NBC, CBS, ABC, NYT, etc...?
Stossel is a liberal A-hole, wrong most times than not.
Boosh! Lying sack of luciferian globalist!
Stossel is a Libertarian. That means quite often I don’t agree with him but compared to the greater universe of journalists he is quite sane.
“What the media don’t get...”. Here goes more nonsense about how the other side is simply misinformed or ignorant. The other side knows perfectly well the consequences of these idiotic regulations. As some dem pol said “its a feature.:.” More power, more money, more Dem voters, seems the regs work pretty good.
The reality that is studiously not mentioned is that Trump’s Tariffs are temporary and will be removed as soon as a trade deal is reached.
Nobama’s regulations were never meant to be removed! Only expanded.
I’ve heard POTUS Trump, among others, talk about eventual “zero-tariff” trade and I think it is still the objective.
Yeah, that's a good one.! How about "collusion" to fix an election.? Maybe even use the "RICO" act because they are obviously totally corrupt and have conspired together to overthrow the President...
That would be so.....enjoyable. :)
Too bad we don't have a "Department of Justus". :(
“use the “RICO” act because they are obviously totally corrupt and have conspired together to overthrow the President”
Can’t ignore the fact that American children are also victims of their mis- and disinformation campaigns and we need to know how best to measure the extent of the damage.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.