Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Army showcases new electronic warfare technology
Army Defense & Security News ^ | Aug. 24, 2019

Posted on 08/24/2019 5:21:50 PM PDT by ASA Vet

Electronic warfare, known as the battle in the electromagnetic spectrum, relies on data and signals to survey, fight and defend and the complex mission executed by the Army’s electronic warfare Soldiers – which includes detecting and responding to enemy jamming attempts and other electronic interference – is intensifying.

Currently, the Army is developing an Electronic Warfare Planning and Management Tool, or EWPMT, to manage and control electronic warfare assets in support of unified land operations.

According to Army News Service, through the EWPMT, the Army can now visually synergize its EW attack, targeting, and surveillance capabilities to enable the maneuverability of forces. The tool also improves spectrum management operations and assists with the intelligence-gathering process.

Operators can streamline the process between the EWPMT and fires support, in addition to being able to configure their system to generate automated responses to a variety of signals or alerts, officials said.

Once a EWPMT system is triggered, the program will initiate its automated workflow, often distributing information throughout a tactical operations center. Depending on the engagement, operators can initiate a fire mission and provide tactical graphics for support.

“Operational units can now visualize the electromagnetic spectrum,” said Lt. Col. Jason Marshall, product manager for Electronic Warfare Integration.

“EWPMT is the commander’s primary tool to integrate multi-domain operations into their military decision-making process,” he added.

While still under development — EWPMT increment one, capability drop three — is leveraging user feedback to allow EWPMT to support the electronic warfare officer’s techniques, tactics, and procedures, Marshall said. A pool of electronic warfare Soldiers and electromagnetic spectrum managers, or 25Es, from across the Army are involved in the program.

Instead of waiting for EW to become an official part of the targeting process, program officials are trying to get ahead of the curve to fulfill a future requirement, said Capt. Daniel J. Nicolosi, EWPMT assistant product manager.

Currently, EW operators “have nothing,” added Chief Warrant Officer 2 Will Flanagan, senior electronic warfare targeting officer, who is assigned to the operations group at the National Training Center at Fort Irwin, California.

As an operator, Flanagan is highly involved in the EWPMT’s ongoing developmental process.

“With the EWPMT in front of me, I can show the commander where we’re at, and what we can do,” he said. “This will give us that spot on the TOC floor. This is the first tool to allow us to do our jobs.”

Future iterations of the EWPMT program, officials said, will focus on pacing the threat’s capabilities within a disconnected, intermittent, and latent environment. In turn, the program will help refine the Army’s ability to conduct cyberspace electromagnetic activities in support of multi-domain operations and enable the Army to fight and win on a complex battlefield.

For the EWPMT to be effective, it relies on fielded communications sensors and other EW transmission devices.

The Versatile Radio Observation and Direction, or VROD, Modular Adaptive Transmission system, known as VMAX, have already been fielded to meet mission requirements.

“VMAX is a lightweight man-portable electronics support and offensive electronic attack system. It is used to find, monitor, locate, and jam RF emitters in real time during tactical operations,” said Ken Gilliard, team lead of the Rapid System Applications Team, which falls under the Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Cyber, Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance Center, or C5ISR.

“Its purpose is to create that advantage in the electromagnetic spectrum to provide Soldiers a window to maneuver on the battlefield,” he added.

When VMAX is operating in a support capability, operators can monitor the electromagnetic environment and determine what frequencies an adversary is operating on. Further, Soldiers can use multiple VMAX systems to geo-locate a signal, he said.

Similarly, if VMAX is supporting offensive EW capabilities, it can be used to jam or interfere with the signal within specific frequencies.

VMAX is a self-contained, battery-powered device, which weighs approximately 25-30 pounds, Gilliard said. Soldiers can tether VMAX to a vehicle, a building, or some air platforms. The device can be remotely operated and configured with a wide range of antennas to fulfill mission requirements.

The Army currently owns more than 200 VMAX nodes and 100 VROD nodes, he added. Majority of these devices are already deployed around the globe, many of them supporting operations in Europe and the Middle East.


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: army; ew; miltech; technology; trumpdod; usarmy; usmilitary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: schurmann

My kid Robbie is to computers what Tiger Woods is to a set of golf clubs. The Army needs him and kids like him.


21 posted on 08/25/2019 3:14:24 PM PDT by Cen-Tejas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

“But what does it do? Was this written to intentionally obfuscate that?”

The goal is still to keep us under mushrooms and feed us


22 posted on 08/25/2019 8:47:17 PM PDT by Rembrandt (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SuperLuminal

Based on this psychobabble, it must be getting close to budget preparation time...

IQ Basics required to write, read and understand the above:

Basically, the top two brackets/ranges below:

IQ Range: Classification:

140 and over Genius or near genius
120-140 Very superior intelligence
110-120 Superior intelligence
90-110 Normal or average intelligence
3 more rows•Dec 17, 2018
IQ Basics - IQ Comparison Site

https://www.iqcomparisonsite.com › IQBasics


23 posted on 08/26/2019 9:29:27 AM PDT by Grampa Dave ( Here's the Formula: Hatred + Government + Disarmed Civilians = Genocide !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
"3 more rows•Dec 17, 2018"

Dang!... I must be lost somewhere in row 9 or 10... {:-)

24 posted on 08/26/2019 10:44:43 AM PDT by SuperLuminal (Where is Sam Adams now that we desperately need him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SuperLuminal

Dang!... I must be lost somewhere in row 9 or 10... {:-)

Is that from the top down or the other way:}


25 posted on 08/26/2019 11:29:24 AM PDT by Grampa Dave ( Here's the Formula: Hatred + Government + Disarmed Civilians = Genocide !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: mikey_hates_everything

“I get the technical stuff regarding RF and EW, ...What I try to avoid is the Army/DoD/Program Manager-ese...tends to be very expensive when vendors pitch technical products...” [mikey_hates_everything, post 18]

RF and communications systems are only about 10 percent of the problem. An artificiality, harking back to the days when each subsystem and operational area was served by its own designers & engineers. Causes latter generations to see it as a bunch of separate problems, instead of facets of an overall problem. Your reference to “RF” in isolation is a perfect sign: specialists resist the reality that it’s all the same stuff, from DC through AM, HF, FM, UHF, microwave, on up through EHF, SHF, IR, visible light, UV, X-rays, gamma rays, cosmic rays. The only differences are the frequencies.

I spent the better part of 30 years in uniform, trying to improve the language in official documents. It isn’t a problem that admits of simple, sweeping, final solutions. Not when contracts have to be written that can be legally enforced, while requirements documents have to be written in language agreeable to Congress and users both.

Fellow citizens love to blame Congress, the bureaucracy, contractors, attorneys: anyone but ourselves. Americans have big trouble with the notion that national defense is costly and un-speedy. Despite all the evidence of the past 160 years and more, they still want it in a hurry and on the cheap. It’s impossible to meet all those constraints.


26 posted on 08/26/2019 3:18:06 PM PDT by schurmann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson